Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821656›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2022

Analysis of lower limb prosthetic socket interface based on stress and motion measurements.

Jinghua Tang, Liudi Jiang, Michael McGrath, Dan Bader, Piotr Laszczak, David Moser, Saeed Zahedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinghua TangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-5891
Liudi JiangSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michael McGrathSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Dan BaderSkin Health Research Group, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Piotr LaszczakSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
David MoserSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Saeed ZahediBlatchford Products Ltd., Basingstoke, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was designed to establish a biomechanical assessment platform for the lower limb residuum/socket interface as a function of duration and speed of movement. The approach exploits an interface sensor which measures multi-directional stresses at the interface. The corresponding interface coupling motion was assessed using a 3D motion capture system. A longitudinal study, involving a trans-femoral amputee, was conducted with nine repeated level walking sessions over a 12-month period. The effect of walking speed on interface biomechanics was also assessed. Interface peak pressures and shear stresses in the range of 55-59 kPa and 12-19 kPa were measured, respectively, over all sessions in the 12 months study period at the posterior-proximal location of the residuum. The peak pressure and longitudinal shear values were found to fluctuate approximately 11% and 40% as against its maximum value, respectively, over 12 months. In addition, up to 12° of angular coupling and up to 28 mm of pistoning were recorded over a gait cycle, which was found to change by 29% and 45% respectively over the study period. The variation in walking speed, by altering self-selected cadence, resulted in changes of pressure and shear stresses at mid-stance of the gait cycle. In particular, as compared with self-selected cadence, for fast speed, peak pressure and peak longitudinal shear stress decreased by 5% and 33%, respectively. For slow speed, peak pressure and peak longitudinal shear stress increased by 7% and 17%, respectively. The corresponding angular and pistoning revealed a variation of up to 29% and 45%, respectively. This biomechanical assessment approach shows promise in the quantitative assessment of interface kinematics and kinetics for lower limb prosthetics, the usage of which could assist the clinical assessment of prosthetic socket fit.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsAmputation StumpsBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansLongitudinal StudiesLower ExtremityProsthesis Designinterface couplinginterface stresseslongitudinalLower limb amputeewalking speed

Identifiers

PMID35821656
PMCPMC9449444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.