Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821653›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Does a child's mid-upper arm circumference-for-age z-score represent another nutritional indicator of childhood malnutrition status?

Md Ahshanul Haque, Nuzhat Choudhury, S M Tanvir Ahmed, Fahmida Dil Farzana, Mohammad Ali, Farina Naz, Mohammad Jyoti Raihan, Sheikh Shahed Rahman, Towfida Jahan Siddiqua, Abu Syed Golam Faruque and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Md Ahshanul HaqueNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-8367
Nuzhat ChoudhuryNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8345-5278
S M Tanvir AhmedSave the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fahmida Dil FarzanaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad AliNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farina NazNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Jyoti RaihanNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sheikh Shahed RahmanSave the Children Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Towfida Jahan SiddiquaNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abu Syed Golam FaruqueNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5884-9483
Tahmeed AhmedNutrition and Clinical Services Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child wasting is defined as a weight-for-height/length z-score (WLZ/WHZ) < -2, and this indicator of nutritional status is used worldwide. However, a precise measurement is required for the assessment of a child's nutritional status, which may not always be possible due to expensive instruments, especially in poor resource settings. In some instances, mid-upper arm circumference-for-age z-score (MUACZ) is also being used for screening purposes, which is a simple and useful nutritional indicator. The objective of this paper is to identify the optimal cut-off point for the MUACZ to identify wasted children, and also to determine if the same factors are associated with MUACZ and wasting. Data were derived from the Suchana evaluation data. The optimal cut-off value was estimated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis using acute malnutrition as a gold standard with maximum sensitivity and specificity. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the associated factors with the MUACZ. Using the gold standard indicator of nonwasting (WLZ ≥ -2), a positive outcome, the optimal cut-off point for the MUACZ was -1.27. The area under the ROC curve was 0.88, indicating that the model had a power of 88% to differentiate between the positive and negative classes. It implies that a child's MUACZ was correlated with WLZ, and a MUACZ below -1.27 appeared to accurately identify wasting among children aged 3-23 months. MUACZ < -1.27 might be another useful indicator of childhood wasting than a WLZ < -2.

Indexed as

ArmMalnutritionAnthropometryBody HeightBody WeightChildHumansInfantNutritional Statuschild nutritionepidemiologyfood securityhealth policymaternal nutritionwasting

Identifiers

PMID35821653
PMCPMC9480943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.