ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2022
A guide to area-restricted search: a foundational foraging behaviour.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A light-off response characterised by body contraction and ciliary arrest in Acropora coral larvae.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Hard to handle: infected house finches do not prefer easier-to-consume food.Animal behaviour · 2026Article
- Article
- Efficient planning and implementation of optimal foraging strategies under energetic constraints.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Freely foraging macaques value information in ambiguous terrains.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Scale-dependent foraging behaviour and habitat associations of two sympatric marine top predators.Landscape ecology · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of animal distribution: bridging advances in movement analysis with hierarchical and optimal foraging theories.Landscape ecology · 2026Article
- The role of signal in saltatory pursuit of cryptic stationary targets.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Foraging as an ethological framework for neuroscience.Trends in neurosciences · 2025Review
- Experience-based optimal foraging on planktonic prey in Baikal seals.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Two modes in the absolute velocity statistics in cautious walks of laboratory rodents.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Foraging by predatory ants: A review.Insect science · 2025Review
- Foraging with your eyes: a novel task to study cognitive strategies involved in (visual) foraging behaviour.Cognitive processing · 2025Article
- Article
- The role of oceanographic scales in shaping highly mobile marine predator distributions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Active predators do not necessarily specialize in sedentary prey: A simulation model.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of the Leafcutter Bee Megachile rotundata Reveals Its Ecological Adaptation and Pollination Biology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Area-restricted search is the capacity to change search effort adaptively in response to resource encounters or expectations, from directional exploration (global, extensive search) to focused exploitation (local, intensive search). This search pattern is used by numerous organisms, from worms and insects to humans, to find various targets, such as food, mates, nests, and other resources. Area-restricted search has been studied for at least 80 years by ecologists, and more recently in the neurological and psychological literature. In general, the conditions promoting this search pattern are: (1) clustered resources; (2) active search (e.g. not a sit-and-wait predator); (3) searcher memory for recent target encounters or expectations; and (4) searcher ignorance about the exact location of targets. Because area-restricted search adapts to resource encounters, the search can be performed at multiple spatial scales. Models and experiments have demonstrated that area-restricted search is superior to alternative search patterns that do not involve a memory of the exact location of the target, such as correlated random walks or Lévy walks/flights. Area-restricted search is triggered by sensory cues whereas concentrated search in the absence of sensory cues is associated with other forms of foraging. Some neural underpinnings of area-restricted search are probably shared across metazoans, suggesting a shared ancestry and a shared solution to a common ecological problem of finding clustered resources. Area-restricted search is also apparent in other domains, such as memory and visual search in humans, which may indicate an exaptation from spatial search to other forms of search. Here, we review these various aspects of area-restricted search, as well as how to identify it, and point to open questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.