Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821542›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2022

Functional localization of audiovisual speech using near infrared spectroscopy.

Iliza M Butera, Eric D Larson, Andrea J DeFreese, Adrian Kc Lee, René H Gifford, Mark T Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iliza M ButeraVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. ilizabutera@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-5285
Eric D LarsonInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle Washington, USA.
Andrea J DeFreeseDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Adrian Kc LeeInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle Washington, USA.
René H GiffordDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mark T WallaceVanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Cochlear Implants: Combined Electric and Binaural Acoustic StimulationR01DC009404 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GIFFORD, RENE H · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
Individual differences in cochlear implant users' audiovisual integration and links to speech proficiencyF31DC015956 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BUTERA, ILIZA MYERS · 2016 to 2018
$86k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015956NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009404NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH064913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual cues are especially vital for hearing impaired individuals such as cochlear implant (CI) users to understand speech in noise. Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a light-based imaging technology that is ideally suited for measuring the brain activity of CI users due to its compatibility with both the ferromagnetic and electrical components of these implants. In a preliminary step toward better elucidating the behavioral and neural correlates of audiovisual (AV) speech integration in CI users, we designed a speech-in-noise task and measured the extent to which 24 normal hearing individuals could integrate the audio of spoken monosyllabic words with the corresponding visual signals of a female speaker. In our behavioral task, we found that audiovisual pairings provided average improvements of 103% and 197% over auditory-alone listening conditions in -6 and -9 dB signal-to-noise ratios consisting of multi-talker background noise. In an fNIRS task using similar stimuli, we measured activity during auditory-only listening, visual-only lipreading, and AV listening conditions. We identified cortical activity in all three conditions over regions of middle and superior temporal cortex typically associated with speech processing and audiovisual integration. In addition, three channels active during the lipreading condition showed uncorrected correlations associated with behavioral measures of audiovisual gain as well as with the McGurk effect. Further work focusing primarily on the regions of interest identified in this study could test how AV speech integration may differ for CI users who rely on this mechanism for daily communication.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionFemaleHumansSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSpeechVisual PerceptionfNIRSInfrared spectroscopyMcGurk effectMultisensory integrationSpeech in noise

Identifiers

PMID35821542
PMCPMC9334437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.