Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821448›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention among women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Atun Raudotul Ma'rifah, Yati Afiyanti, Mega Hasanul Huda, Roselyn Chipojola, Yelmi Reni Putri, M A Tantawi Nasution

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Psychological distress, body image, and nutritional status during hospitalization for gynecological cancer surgery: a prospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Atun Raudotul Ma'rifahFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder DjohanJawa Barat, Depok, Indonesia, 16424.
Yati AfiyantiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder DjohanJawa Barat, Depok, Indonesia, 16424. yatikris@ui.ac.id.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-6714
Mega Hasanul HudaInstitute Kesehatan Prima Nusantara Bukit Tinggi, Hermina Hospital Group, Gn. Sahari Sel, Jl. Selangit, RW.10, Kec. Kemayoran, Central Jakarta, Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia, 10620.
Roselyn ChipojolaKamuzu College of Nursing, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Yelmi Reni PutriFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, FIK UI Campus, Jl. Prof. Dr. Bahder DjohanJawa Barat, Depok, Indonesia, 16424.
M A Tantawi NasutionNational Library of the Republik of Indonesia, Salemba Raya, 28 A. Kenari, Senen, Central Jakarta, Capital Region of Jakarta, Indonesia.
University of Indonesia · IDKamuzu Central Hospital · MWMahatma Gandhi University · INNational Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia · IDUniversitas Prima Nusantara Bukittinggi · ID

Funding

Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan KET-130/LPDP.4/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychoeducation interventions have been suggested to improve sexual functioning and quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the psychoeducation intervention on quality of life, sexual function, and psychological outcomes; and to identify the critical components of psychoeducation intervention for women with gynecological cancer. This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoeducation interventions were searched using six English databases, eligible studies were extracted, and the risk of bias was evaluated by two authors independently. A random effects model was used to examine the intervention effects. We conducted subgroup analysis and meta-regression to assess the variables underlying the heterogeneity. In total, eight trials were identified, and 1128 participants were included. Women who received the psychoeducation intervention had better quality of life (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22, 0.97), sexual functioning (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.99), and psychological outcomes (i.e., anxiety and depression (SMD =  - 0.27, 95% CI: - 0.09, - 0.44)). Interventions that combined lecture-based, skill practical, discussion, and counseling were conducted using an online format and were delivered by a team of health professionals that had higher scores of qualities of life. Additionally, involving significant others in the intervention improved sexual functioning. Psychoeducation interventions effectively improve quality of life, sexual functioning, anxiety, and depression. Incorporating lecture-based, practical skills, discussion, and counseling through an online format and involving significant others are beneficial for improving the quality of life and sexual functioning among women with gynecological cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGynecological cancerMeta-analysisPsychoeducation interventionQuality of lifeSexual functioning

Identifiers

PMID35821448
OpenAlexW4285092888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.