SynthesisDer Nervenarzt2022
[History of neurology in the GDR: a systematic review].
Synthesis in Der Nervenarzt, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurology as a discipline developed differently in the two German states after 1945 and little is known about neurology in the GDR.
objectiveThis article examines the present state of historical research on neurology in the GDR. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe systematically screened the existing literature from the period 1991-2021 and assigned the studies to different categories.
resultsWe found significant regional differences in the way specific topics are addressed. We also identified a lack of a general overview on the subject and a lack of studies dealing with neurology within the specific socio-political context of the GDR. Comparative studies between the GDR and the BRD and between the GDR and other countries are also scarce.
conclusionFurther systematic research (in the form of a separate research project) into the history of neurology in the GDR and its role within the socialist healthcare system of the GDR is needed, taking comparative aspects into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.