Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821404›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Suppression without inhibition: how retinal computation contributes to saccadic suppression.

Saad Idrees, Matthias-Philipp Baumann, Maria M Korympidou, Timm Schubert, Alexandra Kling, Katrin Franke, Ziad M Hafed, Felix Franke, Thomas A Münch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diverse and dynamic influences of saccades on visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual Feature Tuning Properties of Short-Latency Stimulus-Driven Ocular Position Drift Responses during Gaze Fixation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Saad IdreesWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8514-1237
Matthias-Philipp BaumannWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria M KorympidouWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Timm SchubertWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6630-1808
Alexandra KlingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Katrin FrankeInstitute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Ziad M HafedWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-119X
Felix FrankeBio Engineering Laboratory, ETH Zürich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. felfranke@googlemail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-1222
Thomas A MünchWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. thomas.muench@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8884-6961
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Basel · CHYork University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception remains stable across saccadic eye movements, despite the concurrent strongly disruptive visual flow. This stability is partially associated with a reduction in visual sensitivity, known as saccadic suppression, which already starts in the retina with reduced ganglion cell sensitivity. However, the retinal circuit mechanisms giving rise to such suppression remain unknown. Here, we describe these mechanisms using electrophysiology in mouse, pig, and macaque retina, 2-photon calcium imaging, computational modeling, and human psychophysics. We find that sequential stimuli, like those that naturally occur during saccades, trigger three independent suppressive mechanisms in the retina. The main mechanism is triggered by contrast-reversing sequential stimuli and originates within the receptive field center of ganglion cells. It does not involve inhibition or other known suppressive mechanisms like saturation or adaptation. Instead, it relies on temporal filtering of the inherently slow response of cone photoreceptors coupled with downstream nonlinearities. Two further mechanisms of suppression are present predominantly in ON ganglion cells and originate in the receptive field surround, highlighting another disparity between ON and OFF ganglion cells. The mechanisms uncovered here likely play a role in shaping the retinal output following eye movements and other natural viewing conditions where sequential stimulation is ubiquitous.

Indexed as

RetinaSaccadesAnimalsHumansMicePhotic StimulationSwineVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID35821404
PMCPMC9276698
OpenAlexW4285089134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.