Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821231›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Quantifying the heritability of belief formation.

Valentina Vellani, Neil Garrett, Anne Gaule, Kaustubh R Patil, Tali Sharot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Motivated Cognition in Cooperation.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina VellaniAffective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK. vellaniuni@gmail.com.
Neil GarrettSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Anne GauleDevelopmental Risk and Resilience Unit, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK.
Kaustubh R PatilInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Tali SharotAffective Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK. t.sharot@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N 013867/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 209108/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 214268/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in behaviour, traits and mental-health are partially heritable. Traditionally, studies have focused on quantifying the heritability of high-order characteristics, such as happiness or education attainment. Here, we quantify the degree of heritability of lower-level mental processes that likely contribute to complex traits and behaviour. In particular, we quantify the degree of heritability of cognitive and affective factors that contribute to the generation of beliefs about risk, which drive behavior in domains ranging from finance to health. Monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs completed a belief formation task. We first show that beliefs about risk are associated with vividness of imagination, affective evaluation and learning abilities. We then demonstrate that the genetic contribution to individual differences in these processes range between 13.5 and 39%, with affect evaluation showing a particular robust heritability component. These results provide clues to which mental factors may be driving the heritability component of beliefs formation, which in turn contribute to the heritability of complex traits.

Indexed as

Multifactorial InheritanceTwins, DizygoticEducational StatusHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID35821231
PMCPMC9276818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.