SynthesisClinical rheumatology2022
Physical exercise for dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilization of Rehabilitation Services After Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy Diagnosis: A Retrospective Cohort Assessment in the United States.The Journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis associated with cutaneous ulcerations: a case-based review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trials regarding physical exercise in dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are heterogeneous. We aimed to summarize and critically analyze the available evidence to support the hypothesis that exercise is safe and improves strength and aerobic capacity. We performed a systematic review of clinical trials regarding physical exercise in dermatomyositis and polymyositis, without time restriction. We included studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciELO, and Web of Science, published in English, Portuguese, or Spanish, and reporting outcomes related to safety, muscle performance, or aerobic capacity. The certainty of evidence was evaluated in accordance with the GRADE methodology. Meta-analysis was carried using pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval as effect measure. We included 19 studies and 298 patients. The certainty of evidence was downgraded due to unbalanced confounding variables. The meta-analysis demonstrated improvements in strength (SMD [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.37-0.85], P < .00001) and aerobic capacity (SMD [95% CI] = 0.82 [0.29-1.34], P = .002), with no difference in creatine phosphokinase levels (SMD [95% CI] = - 0.23 [- 0.5-0.03], P = .08) after the interventions. No exacerbation was reported, and results were favorable in all stages of disease and ages, but might be different in the future with new classification criteria for PM and the inclusion of other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Novel approaches such as blood flow restriction training and aquatic plyometric exercises were promising. Physical exercise in DM/PM patients of all ages is probably safe and moderately improves muscle strength and aerobic capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.