Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821159›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2023

Risk factors and prognostic nomogram for patients with second primary cancers after lung cancer using classical statistics and machine learning.

Lianxiang Luo, Haowen Lin, Jiahui Huang, Baixin Lin, Fangfang Huang, Hui Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lianxiang Luo *The Marine Biomedical Research Institute, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China. luolianxiang321@gdmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-9713
Haowen Lin *The First Clinical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
Jiahui HuangThe First Clinical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
Baixin LinThe First Clinical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
Fangfang HuangGraduate School, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
Hui LuoThe Marine Biomedical Research Institute, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, 524023, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Program of Guangdong Province 2019A1515110201Discipline Construction Project of Guangdong Medical University 4SG21004GProgram of Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province [2021]53
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed an increased risk of secondary primary cancers (SPC) after lung cancer. The prognostic prediction models for SPC patients after lung cancer are particularly needed to guide screening. Therefore, we study retrospectively analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database using classical statistics and machine learning to explore the risk factors and construct a novel overall survival (OS) prediction nomogram for patients with SPC after lung cancer. Data of patients with SPC after lung cancer, covering 2000 to 2016, were gathered from the SEER database. The incidence of SPC after lung cancer was calculated by Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Cox proportional hazards regression, machine learning (ML), Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods, and log-rank tests were conducted to identify the important prognostic factors for predicting OS. These significant prognostic factors were used for the development of an OS prediction nomogram. Totally, 10,487 SPC samples were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (model construction and internal validation) from the SEER database. In the random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) feature importance ranking models, age was the most important variable which was also reflected in the nomogram. And, the models that combined machine learning with cox proportional hazards had a better predictive performance than the model that only used cox proportional hazards (AUC = 0.762 in RF, AUC = 0.737 in XGBoost, AUC = 0.722 in COX). Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves also revealed that our nomogram has excellent clinical utility. The web-based dynamic nomogram calculator was accessible on https://httseer.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/ . The prognosis characteristics of SPC following lung cancer were systematically reviewed. The dynamic nomogram we constructed can provide survival predictions to assist clinicians in making individualized decisions.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryHumansMachine LearningNomogramsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsLung cancerNomogramRisk factorSecond primary cancerSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35821159
OpenAlexW4285095233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.