Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35821110›Full record

Trial reportJournal of surgical education

The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training.

Nicolas Cevallos, Brian Zukotynski, Danielle Greig, Mauricio Silva, Rachel M Thompson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of surgical education. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07515092 (Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07515092 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsVirtual Reality SimulationArmsVirtual reality based simulation training, Standard Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Virtual reality exoskeleton for post-partum uterine tamponade balloon training: Impact on learning and operator satisfaction.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Mechanical validation of 3D-printed orthopaedic surrogate models for screw insertion training.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. 3-D virtual reality surgery training to improve muscle memory and surgical skills in head and neck residents/young surgeons.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolas CevallosUCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Brian ZukotynskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Danielle GreigDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Mauricio SilvaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Orthopaedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, California.
Rachel M ThompsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Orthopaedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: RaThompson@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Regenerative Musculoskeletal Medicine Training ProgramT32AR059033 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI John S Adams, Nicholas M. Bernthal · 2011 to 2026
$4.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR059033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) to prepare surgical trainees for a pediatric orthopedic surgery procedure: pinning of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).

designParticipants were randomly assigned to a standard, study guide (SG) group or to a VR training group. All participants were provided a technique video and SG; the VR group additionally trained via an Osso VR surgical trainer (ossovr.com) with real-time feedback and coaching from an attending pediatric orthopedic surgeon. Following training, participants performed a SCFE guidewire placement on a SawBones model embedded in a soft-tissue envelope (SawBones model 1161). Participants were asked to achieve "ideal placement" based on the training provided. Participants were evaluated on time, number of pin "in-and outs," penetration of the articular surface, angle between the pin and the physis, distance from pin tip to subchondral bone and distance from the center-center point of the epiphysis.

settingOrthopedic Institute for Children, Los Angeles, CA.

participantsTwenty fourth-year medical students, first- and second-year orthopedic residents without experience with the SCFE procedure.

resultsTwenty participants were randomized to SG (n = 10) or VR (n = 10). Average time to final pin placement was 19% shorter in VR group (706 vs 573 seconds, p = 0.26). When compared to SG, the VR group had, on average, 70% less pin in-and-outs (1.7 vs 0.5, p = 0.28), 50% less articular surface penetrations (0.4 vs 0.2, p = 0.36), and 18% smaller distance from pin tip to subchondral bone on lateral view (7.1 vs 5.8 mm, p = 0.42). Moreover, the VR group had a lower average angle deviation between pin and line perpendicular to the physis on coronal view (4.9° vs 2.5°, p < 0.05).

conclusionsVR training is potentially more effective than traditional preparatory methods. This pilot study suggests that VR training may be a viable surgical training tool, which may alleviate constraints of time, money, and safety concerns with resultant broad applicability for surgical education.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsSimulation TrainingVirtual RealityChildHumansPilot ProjectscoachingCompetenciesLearning and ImprovementMedical Knowledgeorthopaedic educationSystems-Based Practicetrainingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35821110
PMCPMC10364838
OpenAlexW4284993232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.