Observational studyScientific reports2022
Comparison of the efficacies of 1.0 and 1.5 mm silicone tubes for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction or stenosis using dacryoendoscopy.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Clinical Impact of Using Real-Time Image-Processing Algorithms (Comb Removal and Image Sharpening) in Dacryoendoscopic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Lacrimal Intubation in the Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparative study of surgical outcomes regarding tear meniscus area and high-order aberrations between two different interventional methods for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of laser dacryoplasty combined with intubation using a new silicon tube in patients with lacrimal duct obstruction.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Dacryoendoscopy: Historical development, philosophical foundation, and clinical perspective.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective observational study analyzed the postoperative outcomes of bicanalicular intubation using different diameters of tube stents for treating postsaccal nasolacrimal duct obstruction. A total of 130 patients diagnosed with postsaccal obstruction who underwent endoscopic-assisted silicone tube intubation were included in the study. Patients intubated with a 1.5-mm large-diameter tube were designated as the LD group, and those with a 1.0-mm normal-diameter tube were designated as the ND group. The patency rates of the two groups at 1 year after tube removal were compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve and restricted mean survival time (RMST) method with τ = 365 days. Results demonstrated that the recurrence rate after tube removal was significantly lower in the LD group as compared with the ND group (p = 0.001). The patency rates at 1 year after removal in the LD and ND group were 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.4, 91.9) and 73.9% (95% CI: 61.7, 82.8), respectively. When comparing the patency rates by the RMST method at τ = 365 days, the RMST difference, RMST ratio, and RMTL ratio were higher in the LD group at p = 0.045, 0.052, and 0.046, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.