ArticleMilitary Medical Research2022
mRNA vaccine development for cholangiocarcinoma: a precise pipeline.
Article in Military Medical Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cholangiocarcinoma:Unveiling the cold tumor microenvironment and strategies for immune rejuvenation.Oncogene · 2026Review
- Integrated Multi-Omics Profiling Identifies an Immunotherapy Vulnerable and Prognostic Associated Subtype in Cholangiocarcinoma.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Identification and Experimental Validation of Tumor Antigens and Hypoxia Subtypes of Osteosarcoma for Potential mRNA Vaccine Development.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles: emerging cell free therapeutic platforms for hepatobiliary cancers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics analysis reveals novel tumor antigens and immune subtypes of skin cutaneous melanoma contributing to mRNA vaccine development.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Lipid-based Non-viral Vector: Promising Approach for Gene Delivery.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- A novel risk score system based on immune subtypes for identifying optimal mRNA vaccination population in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Systemic analysis of the prognostic significance and interaction network of miR-26b-3p in cholangiocarcinoma.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Identification of tumor antigens and immune subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma for mRNA vaccine development.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Ionizable drug delivery systems for efficient and selective gene therapy.Military Medical Research · 2023Review
- Immune microenvironment of cholangiocarcinoma: Biological concepts and treatment strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL) is one of the most aggressive tumors worldwide and cannot be effectively treated by conventional and novel treatments, including immune checkpoint blockade therapy. The mRNA vaccine-based immunotherapeutic strategy has attracted much attention for various diseases, however, its application in CHOL is limited due to the thoughtlessness in the integration of vaccine design and patient selection. A recent study established an integrated path for identifying potent CHOL antigens for mRNA vaccine development and a precise stratification for identifying CHOL patients who can benefit from the mRNA vaccines. In spite of a promising prospect, further investigations should identify immunogenic antigens and onco-immunological characteristics of CHOL to guide the clinical application of CHOL mRNA vaccines in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.