ArticleSurgery2022
Retropubic trocar modified with a load cell to verify contact with pubic bone.
Article in Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgeon Upper Extremity Kinematics During Error and Error-Free Retropubic Trocar Passage.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Surgeon estimation of retropubic trocar position in blind 3D space.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVital injuries during midurethral sling surgery are avoided by maintaining constant trocar contact with bone, and yet this is challenging for a teaching surgeon to monitor during this blind procedure. We modified a retropubic trocar with a load cell to distinguish on-bone and off-bone movement and tested it on a midurethral sling surgery 3-dimensional surgery simulator.
methodsTwo experts and 3 novice surgeons performed retropubic trocar passage on the physical pelvic floor model using the modified trocar. Biofidelity was assessed comparing expert performance on a Thiel-embalmed cadaver and the physical model. The test-retest was assessed comparing performance on the physical pelvic model 2 weeks apart. The force variables were analyzed with paired and independent t tests. We performed post hoc analyses comparing the experts to novices on the physical model.
resultsThe root-mean-squared force was similar between the cadaver and model (24.3 vs 21.1 pounds, P = .62), suggesting biofidelity. Root-mean-squared force was also similar between the test and retest (14.0 vs 19.1 pounds, P =. 30). The expert surgeons exhibited a larger maximum force amplitude (51.2 vs 22.7 pounds, P = .03), shorter time to maximum force (2.7 vs 9.5 seconds, P = .03) and larger maximum rate of force development (171.5 vs 54.0 pounds/second, P = .01).
conclusionThis study suggested high test-retest reliability and adequate biofidelity of the modified trocar used on our midurethral sling surgery 3-dimensional surgery simulator. This innovative trocar can be used both in simulation and in the operating room to help the novice surgeons stay on the bone and to help the attending surgeon monitor safe surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.