Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820921›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Barthel Index is a valid and reliable tool to measure the functional independence of cancer patients in palliative care.

Vinício Dos Santos Barros, Daniela Bassi-Dibai, César Leonardo Ribeiro Guedes, Daniel Nunes Morais, Sabrina Marinho Coutinho, Gabriel de Oliveira Simões, Letícia Padilha Mendes, Plínio da Cunha Leal, Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of a Functional Intervention with Home Follow-Up on Respiratory Symptoms and Functionality in Oncology Patients: A Randomised Clinical Trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barthel index in TAVR patients - a novel use of an old score.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vinício Dos Santos BarrosPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Daniela Bassi-DibaiPostgraduate Program in Programs Management and Health Services, Universidade Ceuma, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
César Leonardo Ribeiro GuedesPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Daniel Nunes MoraisDepartment of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Sabrina Marinho CoutinhoDepartment of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Gabriel de Oliveira SimõesDepartment of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Letícia Padilha MendesDepartment of Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Plínio da Cunha LealPostgraduate Program in Adult Health, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Almir Vieira Dibai-FilhoPostgraduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil. dibaifilho@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRCentro Universitário do Maranhão · BRFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur objective was to verify the reliability, internal consistency and construct validity of the Barthel Index in Brazilian cancer patients in palliative care.

methodsWe included patients with cancer, both sexes, and age greater than or equal to 18 years. We used to evaluate patients the Barthel Index, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and European Organization for Research in the Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire-core 15 (EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL). The measurement properties evaluated in this study were test-retest and inter-rater reliability and construct validity (tested by means of correlations with other instruments).

resultsWe included 220 patients for construct validity and a subsample of 27 patients for reliability analyses. We observed adequate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.962) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.942). There were adequate correlations between the Barthel Index and the KPS (rho = 0.766), and the functional capacity domain of the EORTC-QLQ-C15-PAL (rho = -0.698).

conclusionThe Brazilian version of the Barthel Index presents adequate test-retest and inter-rater reliability, acceptable internal consistency, and valid construct for measuring functional independence in cancer patients.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareFemaleFunctional StatusHumansMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsCancerFunctional capacitySurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35820921
PMCPMC9277778
OpenAlexW4285037904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.