Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820916›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Preparedness and management during the first phase of the COVID-19 outbreak - a survey among emergency primary care services in Norway.

Jonas Nordvik Dale, Tone Morken, Knut Eirik Eliassen, Jesper Blinkenberg, Guri Rørtveit, Steinar Hunskaar, Ingrid Keilegavlen Rebnord, Valborg Baste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonas Nordvik DaleNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway. jond@norceresearch.no.
Tone MorkenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Knut Eirik EliassenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jesper BlinkenbergNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Guri RørtveitDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Steinar HunskaarNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Ingrid Keilegavlen RebnordNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Valborg BasteNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergency primary care (EPC) services in Norway have been at the frontline of the COVID-19 pandemic. Knowledge about the EPC services' management of the COVID-19 outbreak can be used to prepare for future outbreaks and improve patient management. The objectives of this study were to identify pandemic preparedness and management strategies in EPC centres in Norway during the COVID-19 outbreak.

methodsQuestions regarding patient management of the COVID-19 outbreak were included in data collection for the National Out-Of-Hours Services Registry. The data collection was web-based, and an invitation was sent by email to the managers of all EPC services in Norway in June 2020. The EPC services were asked questions about pre-pandemic preparedness, access to personal protective equipment (PPE), organizational measures taken, and how staffing was organized during the onset of the pandemic.

resultsThere were 169 municipal and inter-municipal EPC services in Norway in 2020, and all responded to the questionnaire. Among the EPC services, 66.7% (n = 112) had a pandemic plan, but only 4.2% had performed training for pandemic preparedness. Further, fewer than half of the EPC centres (47.5%) had access to supplies of PPE, and 92.8% answered that they needed extra supplies of PPE. 75.3% of the EPC services established one or more respiratory clinics. Staffing with other personnel than usual was done in 44.6% (n = 74) of the EPC services. All EPC services except one implemented new strategies for assessing patients, while about half of the wards implemented new strategies for responding to emergency calls. None of the largest EPC services experienced that their pandemic plan was adequate, while 13.3% of the medium-sized EPC services and 48.9% of the small EPC services reported having an adequate pandemic plan.

conclusionsEven though the EPC services lacked well-tested plans and had insufficient supplies of PPE at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, most services adapted to the pandemic by altering the ways they worked and by hiring health care professionals from other disciplines. These observations may help decision makers plan for future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanDisease OutbreaksHumansPandemicsPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Emergency primary careOut of hours servicePandemicPreparednessPrimary carePrimary care clinic

Identifiers

PMID35820916
PMCPMC9275270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.