Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820894›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Finding their place - general practitioners' experiences with palliative care-a Norwegian qualitative study.

Anne Fasting, Irene Hetlevik, Bente Prytz Mjølstad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne FastingGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PO Box 8905 MTFS, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. anne.fasting@ntnu.no.
Irene HetlevikGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PO Box 8905 MTFS, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Bente Prytz MjølstadGeneral Practice Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PO Box 8905 MTFS, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOKristiansund Sykehus · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern palliative care focuses on enabling patients to spend their remaining time at home, and dying comfortably at home, for those patients who want it. Compared to many European countries, few die at home in Norway. General practitioners' (GPs') involvement in palliative care may increase patients' time at home and achievements of home death. Norwegian GPs are perceived as missing in this work. The aim of this study is to explore GPs' experiences in palliative care regarding their involvement in this work, how they define their role, and what they think they realistically can contribute towards palliative patients.

methodsWe performed focus group interviews with GPs, following a semi-structured interview guide. We included four focus groups with a total of 25 GPs. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. We performed qualitative analysis on these interviews, inspired by interpretative phenomenological analysis.

resultsStrengths of the GP in the provision of palliative care consisted of characteristics of general practice and skills they relied on, such as general medical knowledge, being coordinator of care, and having a personal and longitudinal knowledge of the patient and a family perspective. They generally had positive attitudes but differing views about their formal role, which was described along three positions towards palliative care: the highly involved, the weakly involved, and the uninvolved GP.

conclusionGPs have evident strengths that could be important in the provision of palliative care. They rely on general medical knowledge and need specialist support. They had no consensus about their role in palliative care. Multiple factors interact in complex ways to determine how the GPs perceive their role and how involved they are in palliative care. GPs may possess skills and knowledge complementary to the specialized skills of palliative care team physicians. Specialized teams with extensive outreach activities should be aware of the potential they have for both enabling and deskilling GPs.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHospice and Palliative Care NursingFamily PracticeHumansPalliative CareQualitative ResearchAdvance care planningEnd-of-life careGeneral practiceNorwayPalliative carePalliative medicinePrimary careTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID35820894
PMCPMC9277777
OpenAlexW4285091359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.