Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820835›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2022

Development and validation of a clinical risk model to predict the hospital mortality in ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a population-based study.

Weiyan Ye, Rujian Li, Hanwen Liang, Yongbo Huang, Yonghao Xu, Yuchong Li, Limin Ou, Pu Mao, Xiaoqing Liu, Yimin Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Predictive modeling of ARDS mortality integrating biomarker/cytokine, clinical and metabolomic data.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weiyan Ye *Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Rujian Li *Department of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanwen Liang *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongbo HuangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yonghao XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuchong LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Limin OuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Pu MaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoqing LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. lxq1118@126.com.
Yimin LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. dryiminli@vip.163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge variability in mortality exists in patients of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially those with invasive ventilation. The aim of this study was to develop a model to predict risk of in-hospital death in ventilated ARDS patients.

methodsVentilated patients with ARDS from two public databases (MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD) were randomly divided as training cohort and internal validation cohort. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and then Logistic regression was used to construct a predictive model with demographic, clinical, laboratory, comorbidities and ventilation variables ascertained at first 24 h of ICU admission and invasive ventilation. Our model was externally validated using data from another database (MIMIC-IV).

resultsA total of 1075 adult patients from MIMIC-III and eICU were randomly divided into training cohort (70%, n = 752) and internal validation cohort (30%, n = 323). 521 patients were included from MIMIC-IV. From 176 potential predictors, 9 independent predictive factors were included in the final model. Five variables were ascertained within the first 24 h of ICU admission, including age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), mean of respiratory rate (OR, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08), the maximum of INR (OR, 1.14; 95% CI: 1.03-1.31) and alveolo-arterial oxygen difference (OR, 1.002; 95% CI: 1.001-1.003) and the minimum of RDW (OR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.09-1.27). And four variables were collected within the first 24 h of invasive ventilation: mean of temperature (OR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.57-0.86), the maximum of lactate (OR, 1.15; 95% CI: 1.09-1.22), the minimum of blood urea nitrogen (OR, 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03) and white blood cell counts (OR, 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06). Our model achieved good discrimination (AUC: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73-0.80) in training cohort but the performance declined in internal (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69-0.80) and external validation cohort (0.70, 95% CI: 0.65-0.74) and showed modest calibration.

conclusionsA risk score based on routinely collected variables at the start of admission to ICU and invasive ventilation can predict mortality of ventilated ARDS patients, with a moderate performance.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultCohort StudiesHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsAcute respiratory distress syndromeDatabaseMortalityPredictionVentilation

Identifiers

PMID35820835
PMCPMC9277886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.