Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820754›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Flexible Work: Opportunity and Challenge (FLOC) for individual, social and economic sustainability. Protocol for a prospective cohort study of non-standard employment and flexible work arrangements in Sweden.

Sven Svensson, David M Hallman, SvendErik Mathiassen, Marina Heiden, Arne Fagerström, Jean Claude Mutiganda, Gunnar Bergström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sven SvenssonDepartment of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden sven.svensson@hig.se.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-1981
David M HallmanDepartment of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2741-1868
SvendErik MathiassenDepartment of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.
Marina HeidenDepartment of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.
Arne FagerströmFaculty of Education and Business Studies, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.
Jean Claude MutigandaFaculty of Education and Business Studies, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.
Gunnar BergströmDepartment of Occupational Health Science and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gavle, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFlexibility in working life, including non-standard employment (NSE) and flexible work arrangements (FWAs), offers the organisation a better ability to adapt to changing conditions while also posing considerable challenges for organisations as well as workers. The aim of the Flexible Work: Opportunity and Challenge (FLOC) study is to investigate associations between NSE and FWA on the one hand, and individual, social and economic sustainability on the other. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective open cohort study targets approximately 8000 workers 18-65 years old in 8-10 public and private organisations in Sweden. We will use a comprehensive battery of measurement methods addressing financial performance, physical and psychosocial exposures, and physical and mental health, both at the organisational and the individual level. Methods include valid survey questionnaires and register data, and, in subpopulations, technical measurements, interviews and diaries. Main exposures are type of employment and type of work arrangement. Main outcomes are indicators of social and economic sustainability and, at the individual level, health and well-being. Data, collected over 54 months at approximately 18-month intervals, will be analysed using multivariate methods considering main effects as well as potential effect modifiers. The analyses will take into account that respondents are nested in organisations, divisions and/or have specific managers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: FLOC is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (decision numbers 2019-06220, 2020-06094 and 2021-02725). Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences, and researchers will assist the organisations in improving policies and routines for employment and organisation of work.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental HealthAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSwedenYoung AdultEPIDEMIOLOGYOCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINESOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35820754
PMCPMC9274509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.