Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820685›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Fever therapy in febrile adults: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

Johan Holgersson, Ameldina Ceric, Naqash Sethi, Niklas Nielsen, Janus Christian Jakobsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Refined trial sequential analysis for meta-analyses with few studies.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Nursing management decisions in fever: a mixed-methods approach to understanding.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Temperature control in acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Diagnostic accuracy ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  17. Good Bug, Bad Bug: What Is Influencing the Fever Response during Infection?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Temperature control in sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Through the Looking Glass: The Paradoxical Evolution of Targeted Temperature Management for Comatose Survivors of Cardiac Arrest.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan HolgerssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden johan.holgersson@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-1858-2371
Ameldina CericDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Naqash SethiCopenhagen Trial Unit - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niklas NielsenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Janus Christian JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit - Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lund University · SECopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effects of fever therapy compared with no fever therapy in a wide population of febrile adults.

designSystematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials. DATA SOURCES: CENTRAL, BIOSIS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection, searched from their inception to 2 July 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials in adults diagnosed as having fever of any origin. Included experimental interventions were any fever therapy, and the control intervention had to be no fever therapy (with or without placebo/sham). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Primary outcomes were all cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and non-serious adverse events. Aggregate data were synthesised with meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, and trial sequential analyses, and the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsForty two trials assessing 5140 participants were included. Twenty three trials assessed 11 different antipyretic drugs, 11 trials assessed physical cooling, and eight trials assessed a combination of antipyretic drugs and physical cooling. Of the participants, 3007 were critically ill, 1892 were non-critically ill, 3277 had infectious fever, and 1139 had non-infectious fever. All trials were assessed as being at high risk of bias. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis showed that the hypothesis that fever therapy reduces the risk of death (risk ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.19; I

conclusionsFever therapy does not seem to affect the risk of death and serious adverse events. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019134006.

Indexed as

AntipyreticsAdultBiasCritical IllnessFeverHumansQuality of LifeAntipyretics

Identifiers

PMID35820685
PMCPMC9274300
OpenAlexW4285041067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.