Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820405›Full record

ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders2022

Normative Data of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale of Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Taiwan.

Yi-Chia Wei, Chih-Ken Chen, Chemin Lin, Pin-Yuan Chen, Pei-Chun Hsu, Ching-Po Lin, Yu-Chiau Shyu, Wen-Yi Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06875024 (A Series of Studies on Influencing Factors and Intelligent Intervention Programs for Hospitalized Elderly People With Frailty), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06875024 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Series of Studies on Influencing Factors and Intelligent Intervention Programs for Hospitalized Elderly People With Frailty

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2025 to 2026Enrolled156ConditionsFrailty in Older AdultsArmsIntelligent intervention programs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Screening for Executive Impairment in Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia: Evidence from the Greek Version of the Frontier Executive Screen.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi-Chia WeiDepartment of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, yichiawei@gmail.com.
Chih-Ken ChenCommunity Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Chemin LinCommunity Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Pin-Yuan ChenCommunity Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Pei-Chun HsuDepartment of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Ching-Po LinInstitute of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Chiau ShyuCommunity Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Wen-Yi HuangDepartment of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAppropriate tools and references are essential for evaluating individuals' cognitive levels. This study validated the Taiwan version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and provided normative data for the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and ADAS-cog in community-dwelling older adults.

methodsMMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog were administered to 150 nondemented healthy adults aged 55-85 years during 2018-2020 as part of the Northeastern Taiwan Community Medicine Research Cohort. ADAS-cog was translated from the original English version to traditional Chinese with cultural and language considerations in Taiwan. Cronbach's alpha (α) tested the reliability of ADAS-cog, and Pearson correlations examined its external validity using MMSE and MoCA as comparisons. Normative data were generated and stratified by age and education, and the one-way analysis of variance compared scores between age and education groups. Another 20 hospital-acquired participants with cognitive impairment joined the 150 healthy participants. Comparisons in the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) tiers tested the discriminability of the tests for different cognitive levels. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analyzed the power of ADAS-cog in predicting CDR 0.5 from CDR 0.

resultsThe Taiwan version of ADAS-cog had fair reliability between items (α = 0.727) and good correlations to MMSE (r = -0.673, p < 0.001) and MoCA (r = -0.746, p < 0.001). The normative data of MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog showed ladder changes with age (p = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.437) and education (p < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001) in the 150 nondemented older adults. Next, in the 170 mixed participants from the communities and the hospital, MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog scores were well differentiable between CDR 0, 0.5, and 1. In addition, ADAS-cog discriminated CDR 0.5 from 0 by an AUROC of 0.827 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION/

conclusionThe three structured cognitive tests consistently reflect cognitive levels of healthy older adults. The Taiwan version of ADAS-cog is compatible with MMSE and MoCA to distinguish people with mildly impaired from normal cognition. In addition, this study derived MMSE, MoCA, and ADAS-cog norms tailored to demographic factors. The findings highlight the need for stratification of age and education rather than applying a fixed cutoff for defining normal and abnormal cognition.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedCognitionHumansIndependent LivingMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsTaiwanADAS-cogMMSEMoCANormative dataNormsValidation

Identifiers

PMID35820405
PMCPMC9677874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.