Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820329›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2022

Building the phagocytic cup on an actin scaffold.

Mira Krendel, Nils C Gauthier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A critical signaling role for diacylglycerol in phagocytosis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dynamics of phagocytosis mediated by phosphatidylserine.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mira KrendelDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. Electronic address: krendelm@upstate.edu.
Nils C GauthierIFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, 20139, Italy.
IFOM · ITSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Class I myosins regulate protrusive forces at the actin-membrane interfaceR01GM138652 · NIGMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI KRENDEL, MIRA, SIROTKIN, VLADIMIR A · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells ingest large particles, such as bacteria, viruses, or apoptotic cells, via the process of phagocytosis, which involves formation of an actin-rich structure known as the phagocytic cup. Phagocytic cup assembly and closure results from a concerted action of phagocytic receptors, regulators of actin polymerization, and myosin motors. Recent studies using advanced imaging approaches and biophysical techniques have revealed new information regarding phagocytic cup architecture, regulation of actin assembly, and the distribution, direction, and magnitude of the forces produced by the cytoskeletal elements that form the cup. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms leading to the assembly, expansion, and closure of phagocytic cups. The new data show that engulfment and internalization of phagocytic targets rely on several distinct yet complementary mechanisms that support the robust uptake of foreign objects and may be precisely tailored to the demands of specific phagocytic pathways.

Indexed as

ActinsPhagocytosisCell MembraneCytoskeletonPhagocytesActins

Identifiers

PMID35820329
PMCPMC10078615
OpenAlexW4284966490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.