Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820288›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2022

Carrot and stick: Economic support and stringency policies in response to COVID-19.

Vincenzo Alfano, Salvatore Ercolano, Mauro Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincenzo AlfanoDepartment of Economics, University of Messina & Center for Economic Studies CES-ifo, Italy. Electronic address: vinalfano@unime.it.
Salvatore ErcolanoDepartment of Mathematics, Computer Science and Economics, University of Basilicata & CMET 05, Italy. Electronic address: salvatore.ercolano@unibas.it.
Mauro PintoDepartment of Political Science, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Italy. Electronic address: mauro.pinto@unicampania.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the economic losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have implemented, together with policies aimed at stopping the spread of the virus, a mixture of fiscal and monetary measures. This work investigates the effect of containment policies and economic support measures on economic growth in the short run, investigating a time window of six quarters in a cross country perspective. Our results confirm the existence of a negative effect of stringency measures on GDP; we also detect a positive effect from economic support measures. Moreover, looking at the interaction between these two kinds of interventions, our findings suggest that up to a relatively low level of stringency policies, economic support measures are able to positively counterbalance the negative impact of containment and closure policies. When the level of closures became more severe, however, the economic support measures that countries adopt are not able to completely recoup, in the short run, the economic losses due to stringency policies. Results suggest that in order to have a positive net effect, policymakers should take into account the level of stringency measures implemented before investing in economic support.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PolicyHumansPandemicsProgram EvaluationCOVID-19Economic supportStringency measures

Identifiers

PMID35820288
PMCPMC9250161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.