Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35820168›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2023

Dan Tawfik's Lessons for Protein Engineers about Enzymes Adapting to New Substrates.

Ichiro Matsumura, Wayne M Patrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ichiro MatsumuraO. Wayne Rollins Research Center, 1510 Clifton Road NE, Room 4001, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6483-2146
Wayne M PatrickCentre for Biodiscovery, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-8053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural evolution has been creating new complex systems for billions of years. The process is spontaneous and requires neither intelligence nor moral purpose but is nevertheless difficult to understand. The late Dan Tawfik spent years studying enzymes as they adapted to recognize new substrates. Much of his work focused on gaining fundamental insights, so the practical utility of his experiments may not be obvious even to accomplished protein engineers. Here we focus on two questions fundamental to any directed evolution experiment. Which proteins are the best starting points for such experiments? Which trait(s) of the chosen parental protein should be evolved to achieve the desired outcome? We summarize Tawfik's contributions to our understanding of these problems, to honor his memory and encourage those unfamiliar with his ideas to read his publications.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35820168
PMCPMC9851151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.