Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819918›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of radiology2022

Risk of developing gallbladder cancer in patients with gallbladder polyps detected on transabdominal ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kieran G Foley, Zena Riddell, Bernadette Coles, S Ashley Roberts, Brian H Willis

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kieran G FoleyDivision of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-1759
Zena RiddellNational Imaging Academy of Wales (NIAW), Pencoed, UK.
Bernadette ColesVelindre University NHS Trust Library & Knowledge Service, Cardiff, UK.
S Ashley RobertsDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Brian H WillisInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Cardiff University · GBNational Museum Wales · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBVelindre NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701649Medical Research Council MR/N007999/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the risk of malignancy in gallbladder polyps of incremental sizes detected during transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS).

methodsWe searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies recording the polyp size from which gallbladder malignancy developed, confirmed following cholecystectomy, or by subsequent follow-up. Primary outcome was the risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with polyps. Secondary outcome was the effect of polyp size as a prognostic factor for cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies (QUIPS) tool. Bayesian meta-analysis estimated the median cancer risk according to polyp size. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020223629).

results82 studies published since 1990 reported primary data for 67,837 patients. 67,774 gallbladder polyps and 889 cancers were reported. The cumulative median cancer risk of a polyp measuring 10 mm or less was 0.60% (99% credible range 0.30-1.16%). Substantial heterogeneity existed between studies (I

conclusionMalignant risk in gallbladder polyps is low, particularly in polyps less than 10 mm, however the data are heterogenous and generally low quality. International guidelines, which have not previously modelled size data, should be informed by these findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This large systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that the mean cumulative risk of small gallbladder polyps is low, but heterogeneity and missing data in larger polyp sizes (>10 mm) means the risk is uncertain and may be higher than estimated.Studies considered to have better methodological quality suggest that previous estimates of risk are likely to be inflated.

Indexed as

Gallbladder DiseasesGallbladder NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsPolypsBayes TheoremGallbladderHumans

Identifiers

PMID35819918
PMCPMC10996949
OpenAlexW4285076862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.