Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819800›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2023

Multigenerational patterns of parenting-at-risk: A test of interpersonal specificity using copy process theory.

Petra L Woehrle, Kenneth L Critchfield, Sarah Anolik, Carly Bobal, Tiffany A Pempek, Elizabeth A Skowron

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Petra L WoehrleDepartment of Counseling Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kenneth L CritchfieldDepartment of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-1763
Sarah AnolikDepartment of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Carly BobalDepartment of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Tiffany A PempekDepartment of Graduate Psychology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.
Elizabeth A SkowronDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
James Madison University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Oregon · US

Funding

Targeting neurobiological & behavioral mechanisms of self-regulation in high-risk families- Diversity SupplementR01DA036533 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FISHER, PHILIP A, SKOWRON, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Parent-Child Processes: Negative Self-Regulatory and Behavioral OutcomesR01MH079328 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SKOWRON, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
Federal Child Neglect Research ConsortiumNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036533NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study tests ways in which the perception of intergenerational continuity in parenting behaviors among child-maltreatment (CM) and non-CM families conform to Benjamin's (2006) Copy Process Theory, which considers three copy processes: Identification (be like him/her), Recapitulation (behave as if he/she is still present and in charge), and Introjection (treat myself as he/she treated me).

methodAcross two home visits and a laboratory session, 171 mothers of preschoolers (M = 3.7 years) completed the SASB Intrex Questionnaire relative to herself, her history with her parents, and her present relationship with her child.

resultsMothers' retrospective reports of her interactions with caregivers were correlated with the quality of self-reported parenting processes in interactions with her preschooler. Analyses indicated high rates of intergenerational copying in both samples for each copy process. While copying in general was observed in nearly all mothers (roughly 80%-90%) and emphasized warm, securely attached patterns, the copying of hostility and/or lack of affiliation occurred in copied profiles for about one-third of mothers. About the more problematic profiles, CM mothers tended to rate themselves as being in the child-like position they experienced in their own childhood, with themes involving hostile control perceived from their child. By contrast, non-CM mothers copied disaffiliative themes primarily in relation to themselves.

conclusionFindings verify that interpersonal patterns and internalized relational histories are important keys for understanding CM risk. The use of a method that offers interpersonal specificity at the level of individual profiles has application to clinical practice with at-risk parents.

Indexed as

Child AbuseParentingChildFemaleHostilityHumansMaleMothersRetrospective Studiesattachmentchild and family healthinterpersonal relationshipsparenting

Identifiers

PMID35819800
PMCPMC9742119
OpenAlexW4285077389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.