ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
3D localization from 2D X-ray projection.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computer Aided Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Based on 2D/3D Mapping, Virtual Deployment and Online Distal Marker Detection.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preprocedural planning of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMost cardiology procedures are guided using X-ray (XR) fluoroscopy. However, the projective nature of the XR fluoroscopy does not allow for true depth perception as required for safe and efficient intervention guidance in structural heart diseases. For improving guidance, different methods have been proposed often being radiation-intensive, time-consuming, or expensive. We propose a simple 3D localization method based on a single monoplane XR projection using a co-registered centerline model.
methodsThe method is based on 3D anatomic surface models and corresponding centerlines generated from preprocedural imaging. After initial co-registration, 2D working points identified in monoplane XR projections are localized in 3D by minimizing the angle between the projection lines of the centerline points and the working points. The accuracy and reliability of the located 3D positions were assessed in 3D using phantom data and in patient data projected to 2D obtained during placement of embolic protection system in interventional procedures.
resultsWith the proposed methods, 2D working points identified in monoplane XR could be successfully located in the 3D phantom and in the patient-specific 3D anatomy. Accuracy in the phantom (3D) resulted in 1.6 mm (± 0.8 mm) on average, and 2.7 mm (± 1.3 mm) on average in the patient data (2D).
conclusionThe use of co-registered centerline models allows reliable and accurate 3D localization of devices from a single monoplane XR projection during placement of the embolic protection system in TAVR. The extension to different vascular interventions and combination with automatic methods for device detection and registration might be promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.