Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819568›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2022

Learning in and across communities of practice: health professions education students' learning from boundary crossing.

Malou Stoffels, Stephanie M E van der Burgt, Larike H Bronkhorst, Hester E M Daelmans, Saskia M Peerdeman, Rashmi A Kusurkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Malou StoffelsResearch in Education, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 118, 1081 HZ, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.stoffels@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-0864
Stephanie M E van der BurgtTeaching & Learning Centre (TLC) FdG, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Umc Location Amc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Larike H BronkhorstDepartment of Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester E M DaelmansResearch in Education, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 118, 1081 HZ, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia M PeerdemanTeaching & Learning Centre (TLC) FdG, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Umc Location Amc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rashmi A KusurkarResearch in Education, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 118, 1081 HZ, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning to adapt to new contexts is crucial in health professions education (HPE). Boundaries between and within contexts challenge continuity in students' learning processes. Little is known about how HPE students can make these "boundary experiences" productive for learning. We investigated how and what nursing students learn from boundary experiences while they are simultaneously growing into a community of practice (CoP). Using a boundary-crossing lens, experiences of discontinuity were identified in pre-placement and post-placement interviews and diary fragments with 14 nursing students during their placement in an academic hospital. We found that students experience discontinuity as a result of different approaches to nursing care and to learning, both between (academic and clinical) settings and within a setting. When students feel safe enough, they can convert boundary experiences into meaningful learning situations, such as critical discussions with staff. Successfully overcoming boundary experiences improves students' understanding of healthcare and professional development and helps them to develop a personal approach to learning. Students critically address boundary experiences when they are motivated to learn and when they perceive a violation of ethical standards but not when they are concerned that it will affect their assessment. Objects designed to bridge theory and practice can generate additional barriers. This study adds to the HPE literature by demonstrating the learning potential of boundaries and to the broader literature by showing how responses to boundary experiences are intertwined with the process of growing into a CoP. The findings can be used to design future boundary objects.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingDelivery of Health CareHealth OccupationsHospitalsHumansClinical educationHPELandscapes of practiceNursing education

Identifiers

PMID35819568
PMCPMC9274184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.