Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819563›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2022

Impact on 6-month outcomes of hospital trajectory in critically ill older patients: analysis of the ICE-CUB2 clinical trial.

Sara Thietart, Ariane Boumendil, Dominique Pateron, Bertrand Guidet, Hélène Vallet, ICE-CUB2 Study Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara ThietartDepartment of Intensive Care, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France. sara.thietart@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-7247
Ariane BoumendilEBMT LWP, Paris Office, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
Dominique PateronDepartment of Emergency, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Bertrand GuidetDepartment of Intensive Care, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.
Hélène ValletDepartment of Geriatrics, APHP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
ICE-CUB2 Study Network

Funding

Ministère des Affaires Sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des Femmes PHRC 2010 AOM 10154 K100103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the impact of hospital trajectory on survival and functional decline of older critically ill patients. We evaluate 6-month outcomes after admission to: intensive care units (ICU), intermediate care units (IMCU) or acute medical wards (AMW).

methodsData from the randomised prospective multicentre clinical trial ICE-CUB2 was secondarily analysed. Inclusion criteria were: presenting at emergency departments in critical condition; age ≥ 75 years; activity of daily living (ADL) ≥ 4; preserved nutritional status; and no active cancer. A Cox model was fitted to compare survival according to admission destination adjusting for patient characteristics. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data and propensity score matching were performed.

resultsAmong 3036 patients, 1675 (55%) were women; median age was 85 [81-99] years; simplified acute physiology score (SAPS-3) 62 [55-69]; 1448 (47%) were hospitalised in an ICU, 504 in IMCU (17%), and 1084 (36%) in AMW. Six-month mortality was 629 (44%), 155 (31%) and 489 (45%) after admission in an ICU, IMCU and AMW (p < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AMW admission was associated with worse 6-month survival (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.63) in comparison with IMCU admission, after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, ADL, SAPS-3 and diagnosis. Survival was not significantly different between patients admitted in an ICU and an IMCU (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.95-1.46). Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data and propensity score matching found similar results. Hospital destination was not significantly associated with the composite criterion loss of 1-point ADL or mortality. Physical and mental components of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey were significantly lower in the acute medical ward group (34.3 [27.5-41.7], p = 0.037 and 44.3 [38.6-48.6], p = 0.028, respectively) than in the ICU group (34.7 [28.4-45.3] and 45.5 [40.0-50.0], respectively) and IMCU group (35.7 [29.7-43.8] and 44.5 [39.7-48.4], respectively).

conclusionsAdmission in an AMW was associated with worse 6-month survival in older critically ill patients in comparison with IMCU admission, with no difference of survival between ICU and IMCU admission. There were no clinically relevant differences in quality of life in each group. These results should be confirmed in specific studies and raise the question of dedicated geriatric IMCUs.

Indexed as

Critical careFunctional statusGeriatricsIntensive careOutcome

Identifiers

PMID35819563
PMCPMC9274629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.