Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819520›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Informing the development of multidisciplinary interventions to help breast cancer patients return to work: a qualitative study.

Elise Martin, Antonio Di Meglio, Gwenn Menvielle, Johanna Arvis, Aurélie Bourmaud, Stefan Michiels, Barbara Pistilli, Ines Vaz-Luis, Agnès Dumas

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A multidisciplinary intervention to support return to work of individuals with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elise MartinUniversité Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs Et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, 94800, Villejuif, France. el.martin@gustaveroussy.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9679-7226
Antonio Di MeglioUniversité Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs Et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Gwenn MenvielleSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie Et de Sante Publique, Paris, France.
Johanna ArvisLigue Nationale Contre Le Cancer, Paris, France.
Aurélie BourmaudUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, INSERM, Paris, France.
Stefan MichielsOffice of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Barbara PistilliMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Ines Vaz-LuisUniversité Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Inserm, Biomarqueurs Prédictifs Et Nouvelles Stratégies Thérapeutiques en Oncologie, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Agnès DumasUniversité Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, INSERM, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRLa Ligue Contre le Cancer · FR

Funding

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer PGA1 RF20170205420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReturn to work (RTW) after breast cancer (BC) can be a major challenge for patients. Multidisciplinary interventions seem to be effective but the role of digital solutions is under-developed and therefore not evaluated. We explored the preferences, needs, and barriers regarding RTW interventions, including opinions about the use of digital approaches to deliver such interventions.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study based on interviews with 30 patients with BC and 18 healthcare providers in four French regions. Emergent themes were identified using thematic content analysis.

resultsMost providers declared that they did not proactively address RTW with patients, mainly due to having other priorities and a lack of knowledge. The following themes emerged: several development and deployment barriers regarding RTW interventions exist, multidisciplinary interventions are preferred, and there is a need to maintain contact between the patient and workplace during sick leave, including pathways and interlocutors that can facilitate RTW. Participants had mostly positive representations of using digital tools to facilitate RTW; however, fear of loss of human contact and the exacerbation of inequalities were identified as possible risks associated with the development of digital-only interventions.

conclusionsInterventions blending the needs and preferences of patients with BC and the healthcare system are warranted. A personalized multimodal approach with mixed digital and in-person features has surfaced as a possible solution to address the weaknesses of existing interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Since most women work at the time of diagnosis, it is of particular relevance to build interventions promoting RTW.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsReturn to WorkEmploymentFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSick LeaveBreast cancerInterventionQualitative studyReturn to workSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35819520
OpenAlexW4285018404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.