ArticleRheumatology international2022
Incidence of giant cell arteritis in six districts of Paris, France (2015-2017).
Article in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Seasonality and latitude as linked environmental factors in giant cell arteritis incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Pooled it
- The epidemiology of inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Germany in a European context: a systematic review to support workforce planning.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
- The Set up and the Triggers: An Update on the Risk Factors for Giant Cell Arteritis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective population-based study estimated the incidence of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in northeastern Paris. GCA cases diagnosed between 2015 and 2017 were obtained from local hospital and community-based physicians and the national health insurance system database. Criteria for inclusion were living in the study area at that time and fulfilling the 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria and/or its expanded version. Cranial and large-vessel GCA cases were defined by the presence or absence of cranial signs and/or symptoms, respectively. Annual incidence was calculated by dividing the number of incident cases by the size of the study population ≥ 50 years old. Completeness of case ascertainment was assessed by a three-source capture-recapture analysis. Among the 62 included cases, 42 (68%) were women, mean (± SD) age 77.3 ± 9.1 years. The annual incidence of GCA in northeastern Paris and completeness of case ascertainment were estimated at 7.6 (95% CI 5.9-9.8) per 100,000 inhabitants ≥ 50 years old and 66% (95% CI 52-92%), respectively. Incidence increased with age, peaked at age 80-89 years, and was almost twice as high in women versus men. Large-vessel GCA cases, mean (± SD) age 68.6 ± 11.5 years, accounted for 8% of all GCA cases. In this study, GCA epidemiology was mainly driven by cases with cranial GCA signs or symptoms and incidence results were consistent with recent European and past French studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35819504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.