Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819497›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

An encoder-decoder network for direct image reconstruction on sinograms of a long axial field of view PET.

Ruiyao Ma, Jiaxi Hu, Hasan Sari, Song Xue, Clemens Mingels, Marco Viscione, Venkata Sai Sundar Kandarpa, Wei Bo Li, Dimitris Visvikis, Rui Qiu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Comparison ofEJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. AI for PET image reconstruction.The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Extending the clinical capabilities of short- and long-lived positron-emitting radionuclides through high sensitivity PET/CT.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  13. Things are because we see them (O. Wilde): new radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear medicine imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ruiyao MaDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, and Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100084, China.
Jiaxi HuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hasan SariDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Song XueDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clemens MingelsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco ViscioneDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Venkata Sai Sundar KandarpaLaTIM, INSERM, UMR1101, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Wei Bo LiInstitute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Bavaria, Neuherberg, Germany.
Dimitris VisvikisLaTIM, INSERM, UMR1101, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Rui QiuDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, and Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100084, China. qiurui@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3511-6164
Axel RomingerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Junli LiDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, and Key Laboratory of Particle & Radiation Imaging (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, 100084, China. lijunli@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Kuangyu ShiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHInserm · FRTsinghua University · CNHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeep learning is an emerging reconstruction method for positron emission tomography (PET), which can tackle complex PET corrections in an integrated procedure. This paper optimizes the direct PET reconstruction from sinogram on a long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET.

methodsThis paper proposes a novel deep learning architecture to reduce the biases during direct reconstruction from sinograms to images. This architecture is based on an encoder-decoder network, where the perceptual loss is used with pre-trained convolutional layers. It is trained and tested on data of 80 patients acquired from recent Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra long axial FOV (LAFOV) PET/CT. The patients are randomly split into a training dataset of 60 patients, a validation dataset of 10 patients, and a test dataset of 10 patients. The 3D sinograms are converted into 2D sinogram slices and used as input to the network. In addition, the vendor reconstructed images are considered as ground truths. Finally, the proposed method is compared with DeepPET, a benchmark deep learning method for PET reconstruction.

resultsCompared with DeepPET, the proposed network significantly reduces the root-mean-squared error (NRMSE) from 0.63 to 0.6 (p < 0.01) and increases the structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) from 0.93 to 0.95 (p < 0.01) and from 82.02 to 82.36 (p < 0.01), respectively. The reconstruction time is approximately 10 s per patient, which is shortened by 23 times compared with the conventional method. The errors of mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) for lesions between ground truth and the predicted result are reduced from 33.5 to 18.7% (p = 0.03). In addition, the error of max SUV is reduced from 32.7 to 21.8% (p = 0.02).

conclusionThe results demonstrate the feasibility of using deep learning to reconstruct images with acceptable image quality and short reconstruction time. It is shown that the proposed method can improve the quality of deep learning-based reconstructed images without additional CT images for attenuation and scattering corrections. This study demonstrated the feasibility of deep learning to rapidly reconstruct images without additional CT images for complex corrections from actual clinical measurements on LAFOV PET. Despite improving the current development, AI-based reconstruction does not work appropriately for untrained scenarios due to limited extrapolation capability and cannot completely replace conventional reconstruction currently.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyHumansPositron-Emission TomographySignal-To-Noise RatioDeep learningImage reconstructionLong axial field of view PET

Identifiers

PMID35819497
OpenAlexW4285077579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.