Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819251›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2023

Factors associated with perceived ease of access to syringes in Appalachian North Carolina.

Delesha M Carpenter, William A Zule, Caitlin M Hennessy, Donna M Evon, Christopher B Hurt, Bayla Ostrach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Examining geographic disparities in access to no-cost naloxone in North Carolina: A cross-sectional survey of naloxone distribution programs.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delesha M CarpenterEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2025-8140
William A ZuleRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Caitlin M HennessyRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Donna M EvonDepartment of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1414-1846
Christopher B HurtInstitute for Global Health & Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3290-8200
Bayla OstrachFamily Medicine & Medical Anthropology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Mitigating the Outcomes Associated with the Injection Drug Use Epidemic in Southern AppalachiaUH3DA044823 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ZULE, WILLIAM A · 2019 to 2021
$2.4M
Mitigating the Outcomes Associated with the Injection Drug Use Epidemic in Southern AppalachiaUG3DA044823 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ZULE, WILLIAM A · 2017 to 2018
$1.2M
CDC HHSNIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044823NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA044823NIH HHS UG3DA044823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine associations between perceived ease of syringe access, syringe sources, injection behaviors, and law enforcement (LE) interactions among people who inject drugs (PWID) in rural Appalachian North Carolina (NC).

methodsUsing respondent-driven sampling, a diverse sample of 309 self-reported PWID were recruited from rural Appalachian NC. Data were collected via audio computer-assisted self-interview technology from February 2019 through March 2020. Respondents reported demographics, sources of syringes, LE interactions, and injection behaviors. Univariate, bivariate, and linear regression analyses were performed.

findingsRespondents most often obtained syringes from pharmacies and syringe service programs (SSPs). Twenty-one percent disagreed that it was easy to obtain sterile syringes, with 28% reporting low or no access to an SSP. PWID who reported longer physical distances to an SSP had greater difficulty accessing syringes (P<.001). PWID who reported greater ease of access to syringes reported engaging in receptive syringe sharing less often (P<.01). PWID who were stopped and searched by LE more often reported injecting drugs somebody else prepared with nonsterile supplies more often (P<.01). Participants shared used injection supplies more than twice as often than they shared used syringes.

conclusionsThese results underscore the importance of SSPs to mitigate the spread of human immunodeficiency virus and viral hepatitis in rural areas. Supporting mobile SSP services in rural areas could increase access to sterile syringes and injection supplies. SSPs should educate PWID about the importance of not sharing injection supplies. Pharmacies could increase syringe access in areas where SSPs do not operate.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAppalachian RegionHumansNeedle-Exchange ProgramsNorth CarolinaSyringesaccessharm reductionHCVHIVinjectingPWIDsyringe service program

Identifiers

PMID35819251
PMCPMC9772148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.