Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35819124›Full record

ReviewCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Multifocal cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp-A challenging reconstructive case managed with skin substitutes.

Henrique Messias, Mariluz Martins, Carlos Zagalo, Pedro Gomes

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Personalized Treatment for Scalp Angiosarcoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. The role of confocal microscopy in recurrent cutaneous angiosarcoma.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Henrique MessiasHead and Neck Surgery Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8349-8857
Mariluz MartinsHead and Neck Surgery Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Carlos ZagaloHead and Neck Surgery Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro GomesHead and Neck Surgery Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous angiosarcoma (AS) of the head and neck is a rare highly aggressive tumor, often associated with difficult local control of the disease and poor prognosis. This article describes a case of multifocal cutaneous AS of the scalp, mainly addressing its difficult surgical management and challenging reconstruction and concludes with a review of the literature.

methodsA 70-year-old Caucasian male was referred to our hospital with a growing scalp lesion initially suspected to be benign, but later diagnosed with AS.

resultsThe patient had tumor recurrence and a difficult reconstruction for which dermal substitutes proved very useful.

conclusionAS can mimic a benign lesion in its early stages. Skin substitutes, namely dermal templates, can be useful to meet the complex needs of reconstruction and oncological surveillance of patients with AS.

Indexed as

HemangiosarcomaSkin, ArtificialSkin NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleScalpcutaneous angiossarcomadermal substitutehead and necksarcomascalp

Identifiers

PMID35819124
PMCPMC9575495
OpenAlexW4285029295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.