ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Simultaneous quantification of dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib using high-performance liquid chromatography-Photodiode array detection.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: from pathogenesis to treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Robust RP-HPLC Method for Quantifying Dasatinib in Self-Microemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Determination of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Antineoplastic Agents in Pharmaceutical and Biological Matrices: An Overview of Recent Analytical Techniques.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Review
- Simultaneous quantification of dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib using high-performance liquid chromatography-Photodiode array detection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib, second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and ponatinib, a third-generation TKI, are approved pharmaceuticals used in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Although liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays for simultaneous quantification of the four TKIs in human serum have been reported in the literature, a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay that simultaneously quantifies these compounds has not yet been developed. This study aims to establish and validate an efficient HPLC analytical method using a photodiode array (PDA) detector for the simultaneous quantification of the four TKIs.
methodsCalibration standards were prepared by serial dilution of serum samples containing the four TKIs, followed by solid-phase extraction. The four TKIs were eluted in order within 10 min using a binary HPLC gradient system.
resultsThe calibration ranges were 2-500 ng/ml for dasatinib, 100-5000 ng/ml for nilotinib, and 10-500 ng/ml for bosutinib and ponatinib. Intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy values were found to be in accordance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines. The recovery rates were 92.9%-96.0%, 80.7%-86.1%, 91.6%-99.0%, and 86.4%-92.6% for dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, and ponatinib, respectively.
conclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an HPLC-PDA analytical method that allows efficient simultaneous quantification of the four TKIs in the serum of patients with CML. We believe that the method developed herein can improve the efficiency of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with CML in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.