Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818927›Full record

SynthesisThe American surgeon2023

Comparing Outcomes of Appendectomy Versus Non-operative Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Israel Zagales, Matthew Sauder, Sruthi Selvakumar, Jeffrey Spardy, Radleigh G Santos, Jozef Cruz, Tracy Bilski, Adel Elkbuli

Expression of concernAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American surgeon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is non-operative treatment of acute appendicitis possible: A narrative review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Israel ZagalesUniversidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE) Escuela de Medicina, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Matthew SauderDr. Kiran.C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, NSU NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Sruthi SelvakumarDr. Kiran.C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, NSU NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Jeffrey SpardyFlorida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Radleigh G SantosDepartment of Mathematics, NSU NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Jozef CruzDepartment of Mathematics, NSU NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Tracy BilskiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Adel ElkbuliDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.
Nova Southeastern University · USOrlando Regional Medical Center · USFlorida International University · USUniversidad Iberoamericana · DO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis is one of the most common etiologies of an acute abdomen in the emergency department and first-line standard surgical care for the condition has recently been reconsidered. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of surgical intervention versus non-operative antibiotic therapy in the treatment of acute appendicitis in adult and pediatric patients.

methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. The search included all studies until January 15th, 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were independently extracted by the authors of the study. Meta-analysis was performed and Cohen's Q test for heterogeneous effects was performed to determine if fixed or random-effects models were appropriate for use.

resultsTwelve randomized controlled trials investigating a total of 3703 acute appendicitis patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. In the systematic review, eleven RCTs demonstrated that appendectomy had improved effectiveness compared to non-operative antibiotic management. The meta-analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing appendectomy had significantly higher treatment effectiveness compared with antibiotics-only treatment (98.4% vs. 73.3%,

conclusionsSurgical intervention is associated with increased effectiveness of treatment and reduced in-hospital length of stay among patients with acute appendicitis. Guidelines established by institutions and surgical organizations should indicate appendectomy as the standard and superior treatment option for patients presenting with acute appendicitis.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAcute DiseaseAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsacute appendicitisantibiotic treatmentappendectomymeta-analysissurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35818927
OpenAlexW4285076898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.