Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818900›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2023

Community-dwelling older adults' acceptance of smartwatches for health and location tracking.

Jane Chung, Heidi Rishel Brakey, Blaine Reeder, Orrin Myers, George Demiris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Ethics of Wearable-Based Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Mobility Assessment Instruments.Seminars in oncology nursing · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jane ChungVirginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0437-9025
Heidi Rishel BrakeyClinical and Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Blaine ReederUniversity of Missouri School of Nursing, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Orrin MyersDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
George DemirisUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NCRR NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite rapid growth in the popularity of smartwatches, evidence lacks regarding older adults' acceptance of smartwatches. Since most wearable sensors are not designed specifically for older adults, there is a need to examine wearability and usability challenges of wearable sensing devices faced by older adults to facilitate the use of objective measurements of health and mobility.

objectivesWe aimed to examine older adults' perceptions of GPS-enabled smartwatches and to identify potential barriers and facilitators of smartwatch and sensor data use.

methodsAs part of a larger feasibility study, we conducted a mixed-methods study that included a descriptive content analysis of interviews and a brief usability survey with 30 participants aged 60 years and older after they had used a smartwatch for 3 days.

resultsMost participants perceived wearable activity trackers including smartwatches and sensor-based data as useful for tracking health, finding activity patterns and promoting healthy behaviours. Privacy was of little concern, leading to willingness to share activity and location data with others. Participants identified barriers to usability as clumsy design, lack of aesthetic appeal, and difficulty reading the display and using the GPS tracking function. In contrast, identified facilitators of adoption included a big display, high-tech look, self-awareness and possible behaviour change.

conclusionsSmartwatches have the potential of personalised detection of health deterioration and disability prevention, based on analysis of older adults' activities in free-living environments. The usefulness of this technology for older adults can be significantly increased by addressing usability issues and providing instructions on challenging features. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To support sustained self-monitoring behaviours through wearable sensor devices in older adults, it is critical to examine how they perceive those devices and identify factors affecting technology acceptance that can maximise adoption.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesWearable Electronic DevicesAgedHealth StatusHumansIndependent LivingMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesactivity trackersGPS trackinglocation trackingolder adultssmartwatchestechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID35818900
PMCPMC10078487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.