Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818866›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International AIDS Society2022

Frameworks and measures for HIV-related internalized stigma, stigma and discrimination in healthcare and in laws and policies: a systematic review.

Laura Ferguson, Sofia Gruskin, Maria Bolshakova, Sachi Yagyu, Ning Fu, Nicky Cabrera, Mary Rozelle, Kasoka Kasoka, Tessa Oraro-Lawrence, Lucy Stackpool-Moore and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura FergusonInstitute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-793X
Sofia GruskinInstitute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2418-011X
Maria BolshakovaSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3193-6007
Sachi YagyuSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Ning FuSchool of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.
Nicky CabreraSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mary RozelleSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Kasoka KasokaInternational AIDS Society, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tessa Oraro-LawrenceInternational AIDS Society, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lucy Stackpool-MooreInternational AIDS Society, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aneesa MotalaSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Susanne HempelSouthern California Evidence Review Center, Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1597-5110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is strong global commitment to eliminate HIV-related stigma, and work in this area continues to evolve. Wide variation exists in frameworks and measures used.

methodsBuilding on the existing knowledge syntheses, we carried out a systematic review to identify frameworks and measures aiming to understand or assess internalized stigma, stigma and discrimination in healthcare, and in law and policy. The review addressed two questions: Which conceptual frameworks have been proposed to assess internalized stigma, stigma and discrimination experienced in healthcare settings, and stigma and discrimination entrenched in national laws and policies? Which measures of these different types of stigma and discrimination have been proposed and what are their descriptive properties? Searches, completed on 6 May 2021, cover publications from 2008 onwards. The review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021249348), the protocol incorporated stakeholder input, and the data are available in the Systematic Review Data Repository. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Sixty-nine frameworks and 50 measures met the inclusion criteria. Critical appraisal figures and detailed evidence tables summarize these resources. We established a compendium of frameworks and a catalogue of measures of HIV-related stigma and discrimination. Seventeen frameworks and 10 measures addressed at least two of our focus domains, with least attention to stigma and discrimination in law and policy. The lack of common definitions and variability in scope and structure of HIV-related frameworks and measures creates challenges in understanding what is being addressed and measured, both in relation to stigma and efforts to mitigate or reduce its harmful effects. Having comparable data is essential for tracking change over time within and between interventions.

conclusionsThis systematic review provides an evidence base of current understandings of HIV-related stigma and discrimination and how further conceptual clarification and increased adaptation of existing tools might help overcome challenges across the HIV care continuum. With people living with HIV at the centre, experts from different stakeholder groups could usefully collaborate to guide a more streamlined approach for the field. This can help to achieve global targets and understand, measure and help mitigate the impact of different types of HIV-related stigma on people's health and quality of life.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsQuality of LifeDelivery of Health CareHumansPolicySocial Stigmahuman rightskey and vulnerable populationslaw and policyquality of lifestigmastructural drivers

Identifiers

PMID35818866
PMCPMC9274352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.