Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818770›Full record

ReviewESC heart failure2022

Digital health in older adults for the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases and frailty. A clinical consensus statement from the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice/Taskforce on Geriatric Cardiology, the ESC Digital Health Committee and the ESC Working Group on e-Cardiology.

Luigina Guasti, Polychronis Dilaveris, Mamas A Mamas, Dimitrios Richter, Ruxandra Christodorescu, Joost Lumens, Mark J Schuuring, Stefano Carugo, Jonathan Afilalo, Marc Ferrini and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Frailty in Cancer: Why Bother and Ways Forward.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Luigina GuastiUniversity of Insubria - Department of Medicine and Surgery; ASST-settelaghi, Varese, Italy.
Polychronis DilaverisFirst Department of Cardiology, Hippokration Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Dimitrios RichterEuroclinic Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ruxandra ChristodorescuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy V. Babes, Timisoara, Romania.
Joost LumensCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mark J SchuuringDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefano CarugoUniversity of Milan, Cardiology, Policlinico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Jonathan AfilaloDivision of Experimental Medicine, McGill University; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital; Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University; Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marc FerriniCH Saint Joseph et Saint Luc, Lyon, France.
Riccardo AsteggianoUniversity of Insubria - Department of Medicine and Surgery; ASST-settelaghi, Varese, Italy.
Martin R CowieRoyal Brompton Hospital (Guy's& St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust) & Faculty of Lifesciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Athens Euroclinic · GRATS Sardegna (Italy) · ITCentre Hospitalier Saint-Joseph Saint-Luc · FRHippocration General Hospital · GRKeele University · GBKing's College London · GBMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of Milan · ITVictor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technology is receiving increasing attention in cardiology. The rise of accessibility of digital health tools including wearable technologies and smart phone applications used in medical practice has created a new era in healthcare. The coronavirus pandemic has provided a new impetus for changes in delivering medical assistance across the world. This Consensus document discusses the potential implementation of digital health technology in older adults, suggesting a practical approach to general cardiologists working in an ambulatory outpatient clinic, highlighting the potential benefit and challenges of digital health in older patients with, or at risk of, cardiovascular disease. Advancing age may lead to a progressive loss of independence, to frailty, and to increasing degrees of disability. In geriatric cardiology, digital health technology may serve as an additional tool both in cardiovascular prevention and treatment that may help by (i) supporting self-caring patients with cardiovascular disease to maintain their independence and improve the management of their cardiovascular disease and (ii) improving the prevention, detection, and management of frailty and supporting collaboration with caregivers. Digital health technology has the potential to be useful for every field of cardiology, but notably in an office-based setting with frequent contact with ambulatory older adults who may be pre-frail or frail but who are still able to live at home. Cardiologists and other healthcare professionals should increase their digital health skills and learn how best to apply and integrate new technologies into daily practice and how to engage older people and their caregivers in a tailored programme of care.

Indexed as

CardiologyCardiovascular DiseasesFrailtyAgedConsensusHumansPandemicsCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular preventionDigital healthDigital technologyeHealthFrailtyGeriatric cardiologyOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID35818770
PMCPMC9715874
OpenAlexW4285033840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.