Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818699›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2022

Genomic prediction for canopy height and dry matter yield in alfalfa using family bulks.

Mario Henrique Murad Leite Andrade, Janam P Acharya, Juliana Benevenuto, Ivone de Bem Oliveira, Yolanda Lopez, Patricio Munoz, Marcio F R Resende, Esteban F Rios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Forage Crop Research in the Modern Age.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction of Alfalfa (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mario Henrique Murad Leite AndradeAgronomy Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-9799
Janam P AcharyaAgronomy Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Juliana BenevenutoHorticultural Sciences Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4698-2738
Ivone de Bem OliveiraHortifrut North America, Inc., Estero, FL, 33928, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3723-9747
Yolanda LopezAgronomy Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Patricio MunozHorticultural Sciences Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-9351
Marcio F R ResendeHorticultural Sciences Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2367-0766
Esteban F RiosAgronomy Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3389-7195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has proven to be an effective method to increase genetic gain rates and accelerate breeding cycles in many crop species. However, its implementation requires large investments to phenotype of the training population and for routine genotyping. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the major cultivated forage legumes, showing high-quality nutritional value. Alfalfa breeding is usually carried out by phenotypic recurrent selection and is commonly done at the family level. The application of GS in alfalfa could be simplified and less costly by genotyping and phenotyping families in bulks. For this study, an alfalfa reference population composed of 142 full-sib and 35 half-sib families was bulk-genotyped using target enrichment sequencing and phenotyped for dry matter yield (DMY) and canopy height (CH) in Florida, USA. Genotyping of the family bulks with 17,707 targeted probes resulted in 114,945 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The markers revealed a population structure that matched the mating design, and the linkage disequilibrium slowly decayed in this breeding population. After exploring multiple prediction scenarios, a strategy was proposed including data from multiple harvests and accounting for the G×E in the training population, which led to a higher predictive ability of up to 38 and 24% for DMY and CH, respectively. Although this study focused on the implementation of GS in alfalfa families, the bulk methodology and the prediction schemes used herein could guide future studies in alfalfa and other crops bred in bulks.

Indexed as

Medicago sativaPlant BreedingGenomicsLinkage Disequilibrium

Identifiers

PMID35818699
PMCPMC12807079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.