Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818575›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Lessons from the frontline: Documenting the pandemic emergency care experience from the Pacific region - Infrastructure and equipment.

Megan Cox, Deepak Sharma, Georgina Phillips, Rob Mitchell, Lisa-Maree Herron, Claire E Brolan, Gerard O'Reilly, Sarah Körver, Mangu Kendino, Penisimani Poloniati and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Megan CoxFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Deepak SharmaColonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji.
Georgina PhillipsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rob MitchellSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisa-Maree HerronSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Claire E BrolanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gerard O'ReillySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah KörverSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mangu KendinoPort Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea.
Penisimani PoloniatiEmergency Department, Vaiola Hospital, Nuku'alofa, The Kingdom of Tonga.
Berlin KafoaPublic Health Division, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Suva, Fiji.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted challenges for all health systems worldwide. This research aimed to explore the impact of COVID-19 across the Pacific especially with regards to emergency care (EC) and clinicians' preparations and responses. Methods: A collaboration of Australia and Pacific researchers conducted prospective qualitative research over 18 months of the pandemic. In this three phase study data were gathered from Emergency Clinicians and stakeholders through online support forums, in-depth interviews and focus groups. A phenomenological methodological approach was employed to explore the lived experience of participants. This paper discusses the findings of the study regarding the EC building block of 'Infrastructure and Equipment.' Findings: Pre-existing infrastructure and equipment were not sufficient to help control the pandemic. Adequate space and correct equipment were essential needs for Pacific Island emergency clinicians, with donations, procurement and local ingenuity required for suitable, sustainable supplies and facilities. Adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) conferred a sense of security and increased Health Care Workers willingness to attend to patients. Interpretation: Investing in adequate infrastructure and appropriate equipment is crucial for an effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The sustainability of such investments in the Pacific context is paramount for ongoing EC and preparation for future surge responses and disasters. Funding: Phases 1 and 2A of this study were part of an Epidemic Ethics/World Health Organization (WHO) initiative, supported by Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office/Wellcome Grant 214711/Z/18/Z. Co-funding for this research was received from the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Foundation via an International Development Fund Grant.

Indexed as

Building blocksCOVID-19DonationsEmergency careHealth equipmentHealth infrastructureOxygenPacificPICTsPPEVentilators

Identifiers

PMID35818575
PMCPMC9259041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.