ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2022
Validity of Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer.
Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exercise, cancer, and the cardiovascular system: clinical effects and mechanistic insights.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Relevance of Cardiovascular Exercise in Cancer and Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.Current heart failure reports · 2024Review
- Incorporating Exercise Training into Cardio-Oncology Care: Current Evidence and Opportunities:JACC. CardioOncology · 2023Review
- A bench to bedside perspective on anthracycline chemotherapy-mediated cardiovascular dysfunction: challenges and opportunities. A symposium review.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2022Review
- Exercise Testing in Those Treated for Breast Cancer: Can One Forecast Peak Oxygen Consumption?JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Estimated peak oxygen consumption (Vo Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of estimated Vo Methods: Vo Results: The median differences between measured and estimated Vo Conclusions: HF-FRIEND or oncology-specific equations could be applied to estimate Vo
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.