Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818375›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022

Correction results of atypical clubfeet managed with modified Ponseti technique: A meta-analysis of 354 feet.

Karthick Rangasamy, Vishnu Baburaj, Nirmal Raj Gopinathan, Prateek Behera, Pebam Sudesh, Sabarathinam Ravi Subramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Retrospective Case Analysis of 104 Cases of Talipes Equinus.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karthick RangasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Vishnu BaburajDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Nirmal Raj GopinathanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Prateek BeheraDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Pebam SudeshDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sabarathinam Ravi SubramanianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: Atypical clubfeet are distinct from idiopathic clubfeet. It is resistant to correction by conventional casting methods and often requires a modification of Ponseti's casting technique. Although the initial correction rates are reasonable, relapse and complications are frequent. There is limited literature on the results of modified Ponseti casting of these feet. We conducted this meta-analysis to study a few important aspects of atypical/complex clubfeet treatment by the modified Ponseti technique. Research question: What are the results of atypical or complex clubfeet after treatment by the modified Ponseti technique? Methodology: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and Cochrane Library) were searched for articles reporting on the results of atypical/complex clubfeet treated by the modified Ponseti technique. Details of the number of casts required for correction, rate of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (PAT), other soft tissue procedures required, complications, and relapse rates were extracted into spreadsheets, and meta-analysis was carried out using OpenMeta Analyst software. Results: Ten studies were included for analysis with a total of 240 patients with 354 clubfeet. The initial correction was achieved in all feet. A pooled analysis of the data showed that a mean of six casts was required for the initial correction. The rate of PAT was 98.3%. The overall complication rate was 16.8%. 7.2% required an additional soft tissue procedure apart from the PAT, and relapse of the deformity was observed in a mean of 19.8% cases. Conclusion: Modified Ponseti technique is effective in the initial management of atypical/complex clubfeet. Although the PAT rate is slightly higher in the Modified Ponseti technique, the remaining result parameters are comparable with the results of idiopathic clubfoot managed with the Ponseti method of casting. However, these children should be kept under follow-up for a longer duration to find the exact relapse rates.

Indexed as

AtypicalClubfootComplexCTEVModified ponsetiRelapse

Identifiers

PMID35818375
PMCPMC9270237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.