ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Assessment of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity using a point-of-care nerve conduction study device.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04778878 (Assessment of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity Using a Point-of-care Nerve Conduction Study Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity Using a Point-of-care Nerve Conduction Study Device
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment tools for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a narrative review of clinician, patient-reported, and objective measures.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Review
- Assessment of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity using a point-of-care nerve conduction study device.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Correlation between nerve conduction velocity abnormality patterns and clinical severity grading in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Diagnosis of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity: A Scoping Review.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) includes prompt recognition and dose reduction or discontinuation of the neurotoxic agents. CIPN remains under-detected in routine clinical practice and better methods for its early detection are warranted.
aimsTo evaluate the feasibility of a point-of-care device in the early detection of CIPN. METHODS AND
resultsCancer patients (n = 12) scheduled to receive neurotoxic chemotherapy docetaxel, oxaliplatin (OX), or vincristine were recruited for the pilot study (NCT04778878). The patients were assessed with a point-of-care nerve conduction study device (Mediracer® NCS), EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 and NPSI questionnaires, and healthcare professional-assessed CTCAE-based grading at baseline and thereafter every 6-weeks up to 18 weeks or until chemotherapy discontinuation. The set-up of point-of-care device was easy but it only provide successful NCS measurement results in 55% of the patients. The factors related to failed measurement were older age, more frequent comorbidities, and a history of smoking. With the follow-up measurements, decreasing median nerve mean conduction velocity and amplitude, and increasing median nerve mean distal latency were detected on OX-patients. Of the used questionnaires, NPSI was found to be non-feasible with majority of the patients failing to complete the questionnaire while CIPN20 was feasible on all the subjects. CIPN20 score did not show any changes in the follow-up.
conclusionsPoint-of-care assessment for NCS was feasible but measurements frequently failed especially on patients with pre-existing high-risk for neuropathy. OX-treated showed decreasing NCS results while other measures were unable to access the change. The system should be further validated with a larger patient cohort preferably treated with OX and low-risk for pre-existing neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.