Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818054›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022

Disparities in adult critical care resources across Pakistan: findings from a national survey and assessment using a novel scoring system.

Mustafa Ali Khan, Hamna Shahbaz, Ali Aahil Noorali, Anam Noor Ehsan, Mareeha Zaki, Fahham Asghar, Mohammed Moizul Hassan, Haroon Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Sohaib, Muhammad Ali Asghar and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypercapnia outcome in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilator: A retrospective observational cohort.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Mustafa Ali KhanMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hamna ShahbazDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ali Aahil NooraliDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Anam Noor EhsanDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Mareeha ZakiMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fahham AsgharDepartment of Neurology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Mohammed Moizul HassanMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Haroon Muhammad ArshadDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan.
Muhammad SohaibDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ali AsgharDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan.
Muhammad Faisal KhanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan.
Amber SabeenDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Masooma AqeelDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Haroon KhanDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Tahir MunirDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan.
Syed Kashif AminMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Huba AtiqMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Adil Hussain HaiderMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zainab SamadDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asad LatifDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University, National Stadium Road, Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan. asad.latif@aku.edu.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-017820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, concerted efforts were made by provincial and federal governments to invest in critical care infrastructure and medical equipment to bridge the gap of resource-limitation in intensive care units (ICUs) across Pakistan. An initial step in creating a plan toward strengthening Pakistan's baseline critical care capacity was to carry out a needs-assessment within the country to assess gaps and devise strategies for improving the quality of critical care facilities.

methodsTo assess the baseline critical care capacity of Pakistan, we conducted a series of cross-sectional surveys of hospitals providing COVID-19 care across the country. These hospitals were pre-identified by the Health Services Academy (HSA), Pakistan. Surveys were administered via telephonic and on-site interviews and based on a unique checklist for assessing critical care units which was created from the Partners in Health 4S Framework, which is: Space, Staff, Stuff, and Systems. These components were scored, weighted equally, and then ranked into quartiles.

resultsA total of 106 hospitals were surveyed, with the majority being in the public sector (71.7%) and in the metropolitan setting (56.6%). We found infrastructure, staffing, and systems lacking as only 19.8% of hospitals had negative pressure rooms and 44.4% had quarantine facilities for staff. Merely 36.8% of hospitals employed accredited intensivists and 54.8% of hospitals maintained an ideal nurse-to-patient ratio. 31.1% of hospitals did not have a staffing model, while 37.7% of hospitals did not have surge policies. On Chi-square analysis, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were noted between public and private sectors along with metropolitan versus rural settings in various elements. Almost all ranks showed significant disparity between public-private and metropolitan-rural settings, with private and metropolitan hospitals having a greater proportion in the 1st rank, while public and rural hospitals had a greater proportion in the lower ranks.

conclusionPakistan has an underdeveloped critical care network with significant inequity between public-private and metropolitan-rural strata. We hope for future resource allocation and capacity development projects for critical care in order to reduce these disparities.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdultCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPakistan

Identifiers

PMID35818054
PMCPMC9272593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.