Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35818033›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2022

Validation of remote height and weight assessment in a rural randomized clinical trial.

Bethany Forseth, Ann M Davis, Dana M Bakula, Megan Murray, Kelsey Dean, Rebecca E Swinburne Romine, Kandace Fleming

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03304249 (Rural Disparities in Pediatric Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03304249 nacompletednot on this map

Rural Disparities in Pediatric Obesity: The iAmHealthy Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2017 to 2022Enrolled296ConditionsWeight LossArmsiAmHealthy Healthy Lifestyles Program, Newsletter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mental health outcomes of a pediatric-focused obesity randomized control trial in rural communities.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bethany ForsethCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Ann M DavisCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA. Adavis6@kumc.edu.
Dana M BakulaCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Megan MurrayCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Kelsey DeanCenter for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Rebecca E Swinburne RomineLife Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Kandace FlemingLife Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.

Funding

Rural Disparities in Pediatric Obesity: The iAmHealthy InterventionR01NR016255 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVIS, ANN M · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
A Rigorous Application of the RE-AIM Framework to Examine a Pediatric Obesity InterventionF32DK128982 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI FORSETH, BETHANY · 2021 to 2022
$120k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK128982NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study is to describe and assess a remote height and weight protocol that was developed for an ongoing trial conducted during the SARS COV-2 pandemic.

methodsThirty-eight rural families (children 8.3 ± 0.7 years; 68% female; and caregivers 38.2 ± 6.1 years) were provided detailed instructions on how to measure height and weight. Families obtained measures via remote data collection (caregiver weight, child height and weight) and also by trained staff. Differences between data collection methods were examined.

resultsPer absolute mean difference analyses, slightly larger differences were found for child weight (0.21 ± 0.21 kg), child height (1.53 ± 1.29 cm), and caregiver weight (0.48 ± 0.42 kg) between school and home measurements. Both analyses indicate differences had only minor impact on child BMI percentile (- 0.12, 0.68) and parent BMI (0.05, 0.13). Intraclass coefficients ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 indicating that almost all of the variance was due to between person differences and not measurement differences within a person.

conclusionResults suggest that remote height and weight collection is feasible for caregivers and children and that there are minimal differences in the various measurement methods studied here when assessing group differences. These differences did not have clinically meaningful impacts on BMI. This is promising for the use of remote height and weight measurement in clinical trials, especially for hard-to reach-populations.

trial registrationClinical. Registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03304249 ) on 06/10/2017.

Indexed as

COVID-19Body HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildFemaleHumansMaleRural PopulationBody mass indexClinical trialHeightRemote assessmentRuralWeight

Identifiers

PMID35818033
PMCPMC9272872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.