ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022
Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Prediction of Clinical Endpoints in Survival Analysis With Machine and Deep Learning: A Systematic Review and Regulatory Perspective.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Machine-Learning-Based Evaluation of the Prognostic Significance of the Non-High-Density Lipoprotein to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio in Critical Ischemic Stroke.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Dynamic prediction of adverse outcomes in discharged COPD patients using patient-reported outcomes.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Observational
- Longitudinal evaluation of serial ctDNA kinetics using joint modeling in patients with metastatic breast cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data for dynamic disease risk prediction using proteomics.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- On the Importance of a Clear Definition of Time Horizon for Time-to-Event Dynamic Predictions: A Systematic Review and a Concrete Illustration in Kidney Transplantation.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- IBD Prediction Is Possible, but How Far Are We from Implementing It?Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Review
- Observational
- Fast and flexible inference for joint models of multivariate longitudinal and survival data using integrated nested Laplace approximations.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Dynamic prediction of survival using multivariate functional principal component analysis: A strict landmarking approach.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
- Article
- Prediction of dementia risk from multimodal repeated measures: The added value of brain MRI biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe individual data collected throughout patient follow-up constitute crucial information for assessing the risk of a clinical event, and eventually for adapting a therapeutic strategy. Joint models and landmark models have been proposed to compute individual dynamic predictions from repeated measures to one or two markers. However, they hardly extend to the case where the patient history includes much more repeated markers. Our objective was thus to propose a solution for the dynamic prediction of a health event that may exploit repeated measures of a possibly large number of markers.
methodsWe combined a landmark approach extended to endogenous markers history with machine learning methods adapted to survival data. Each marker trajectory is modeled using the information collected up to the landmark time, and summary variables that best capture the individual trajectories are derived. These summaries and additional covariates are then included in different prediction methods adapted to survival data, namely regularized regressions and random survival forests, to predict the event from the landmark time. We also show how predictive tools can be combined into a superlearner. The performances are evaluated by cross-validation using estimators of Brier Score and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve adapted to censored data.
resultsWe demonstrate in a simulation study the benefits of machine learning survival methods over standard survival models, especially in the case of numerous and/or nonlinear relationships between the predictors and the event. We then applied the methodology in two prediction contexts: a clinical context with the prediction of death in primary biliary cholangitis, and a public health context with age-specific prediction of death in the general elderly population.
conclusionsOur methodology, implemented in R, enables the prediction of an event using the entire longitudinal patient history, even when the number of repeated markers is large. Although introduced with mixed models for the repeated markers and methods for a single right censored time-to-event, the technique can be used with any other appropriate modeling technique for the markers and can be easily extended to competing risks setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.