Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35817846›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2022

Machine learning-based quantitative prediction of drug exposure in drug-drug interactions using drug label information.

Ha Young Jang, Jihyeon Song, Jae Hyun Kim, Howard Lee, In-Wha Kim, Bongki Moon, Jung Mi Oh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ha Young Jang *College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-1300
Jihyeon Song *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hyun KimSchool of Pharmacy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-7135
Howard LeeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
In-Wha KimCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Bongki MoonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. bkmoon@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9382-8306
Jung Mi OhCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jmoh@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-1707
Seoul National University · KRJeonbuk National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) 19182MFDS407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many machine learning techniques provide a simple prediction for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, a systematically constructed database with pharmacokinetic (PK) DDI information does not exist, nor is there a machine learning model that numerically predicts PK fold change (FC) with it. Therefore, we propose a PK DDI prediction (PK-DDIP) model for quantitative DDI prediction with high accuracy, while constructing a highly reliable PK-DDI database. Reliable information of 3,627 PK DDIs was constructed from 3,587 drugs using 38,711 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels. This PK-DDIP model predicted the FC of the area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) within ± 0.5959. The prediction proportions within 0.8-1.25-fold, 0.67-1.5-fold, and 0.5-2-fold of the AUC were 75.77, 86.68, and 94.76%, respectively. Two external validations confirmed good prediction performance for newly updated FDA labels and FC from patients'. This model enables potential DDI evaluation before clinical trials, which will save time and cost.

Identifiers

PMID35817846
PMCPMC9273620
OpenAlexW4285008608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.