Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35817838›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Machine learning techniques for identification of carcinogenic mutations, which cause breast adenocarcinoma.

Asghar Ali Shah, Hafiz Abid Mahmood Malik, AbdulHafeez Mohammad, Yaser Daanial Khan, Abdullah Alourani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Asghar Ali ShahDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hafiz Abid Mahmood MalikFaculty of Computer Studies, Arab Open University Bahrain, A'ali, Bahrain. hafiz.malik@aou.org.bh.
AbdulHafeez MohammadDepartment of Computer Sciences, Bahria University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Yaser Daanial KhanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdullah AlouraniDepartment of Computer Science and Information, College of Science in Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, Saudi Arabia.
University of Management and Technology · PKArab Open University · BHBahria University · PKMajmaah University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast adenocarcinoma is the most common of all cancers that occur in women. According to the United States of America survey, more than 282,000 breast cancer patients are registered each year; most of them are women. Detection of cancer at its early stage saves many lives. Each cell contains the genetic code in the form of gene sequences. Changes in the gene sequences may lead to cancer. Replication and/or recombination in the gene base sometimes lead to a permanent change in the nucleotide sequence of the genome, called a mutation. Cancer driver mutations can lead to cancer. The proposed study develops a framework for the early detection of breast adenocarcinoma using machine learning techniques. Every gene has a specific sequence of nucleotides. A total of 99 genes are identified in various studies whose mutations can lead to breast adenocarcinoma. This study uses the dataset taken from 4127 human samples, including men and women from more than 12 cohorts. A total of 6170 mutations in gene sequences are used in this study. Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Gaussian Naïve Bayes are applied to these gene sequences using three evaluation methods: independent set testing, self-consistency testing, and tenfold cross-validation testing. Evaluation metrics such as accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and Mathew's correlation coefficient are calculated. The decision tree algorithm obtains the best accuracy of 99% for each evaluation method.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBreast NeoplasmsBayes TheoremCarcinogenesisCarcinogensFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMutationCarcinogens

Identifiers

PMID35817838
PMCPMC9273792
OpenAlexW4285009964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.