Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35817825›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2022

Neuron numbers link innovativeness with both absolute and relative brain size in birds.

Daniel Sol, Seweryn Olkowicz, Ferran Sayol, Martin Kocourek, Yicheng Zhang, Lucie Marhounová, Christin Osadnik, Eva Corssmit, Joan Garcia-Porta, Thomas E Martin and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Evolution of diverse (and advanced) cognitive abilities through adaptive fine-tuning of learning and chunking mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Daniel SolCSIC-CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain. d.sol@creaf.uab.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6346-6949
Seweryn OlkowiczDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2370-4513
Ferran SayolCSIC-CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-7487
Martin KocourekDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-4198
Yicheng ZhangDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-6304
Lucie MarhounováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Christin OsadnikDepartment of General Zoology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eva CorssmitCSIC-CREAF (Centre for Ecological Research and Applied Forestries), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.
Joan Garcia-PortaDepartament de Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística, Facultat de Biologia & Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Thomas E MartinMontana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4028-4867
Louis LefebvreDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. louis.lefebvre@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6445-0292
Pavel NěmecDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. pgnemec@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0277-0239
Charles University · CZCentre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications · ESMcGill University · CAUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A longstanding issue in biology is whether the intelligence of animals can be predicted by absolute or relative brain size. However, progress has been hampered by an insufficient understanding of how neuron numbers shape internal brain organization and cognitive performance. On the basis of estimations of neuron numbers for 111 bird species, we show here that the number of neurons in the pallial telencephalon is positively associated with a major expression of intelligence: innovation propensity. The number of pallial neurons, in turn, is greater in brains that are larger in both absolute and relative terms and positively covaries with longer post-hatching development periods. Thus, our analyses show that neuron numbers link cognitive performance to both absolute and relative brain size through developmental adjustments. These findings help unify neuro-anatomical measures at multiple levels, reconciling contradictory views over the biological significance of brain expansion. The results also highlight the value of a life history perspective to advance our understanding of the evolutionary bases of the connections between brain and cognition.

Indexed as

BirdsNeuronsAnimalsBrainIntelligenceOrgan Size

Identifiers

PMID35817825
OpenAlexW4285005948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.